Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 924 So. 2d 144.
- State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Dante Key La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana Versus Pedro A. Monterroso La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
-
State v. Gray
235 So. 3d 1270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/3/06), and (where this Court held thát the prosecutor’s comment, during cross-examination of a witness, that the defendant had been in jail for two years, did not fall within'the mandatory mistrial provisions of La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/3/06), as follows: “‘In determining whether the ruling on a motion to suppress was correct, the court is not limited to the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion, but may consider all pertinent evidence given at the trial of the case.’” We find that Detective Andrus’ affidavit was sufficient for the judge
-
State v. Williams
201 So. 3d 379
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/3/06), , , as follows: “ ‘In determining whether the ruling on a motion to suppress was correct, the court is not limited to the evidence adduced at "the hearing on the motion, but may consider all pertinent evidence given at the trial of the case.’ ” We find that Detective Andrus’ affidavit was' sufficient for the judge signi
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Jones
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2/3/06), the defendant argued that the bill of information was defective because it did not describe the things taken.
- State of Louisiana v. Carlos Rios Cortes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State v. Cortes
84 So. 3d 733
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 4/26/05) , , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), , .
-
State v. Parker
71 So. 3d 383
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 4/26/05), , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), and 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), ( (La.
-
State v. Mosley
54 So. 3d 692
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also, State v. Williams, 04-1309, pp. 18-19 (La.App.4/26/05), , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), , and 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), , ; State v. Evans, 02-1108, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
-
State v. Santos
40 So. 3d 167
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 4/26/05), , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), and 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), , this Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for mistrial based on potentially prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor in the presence of the jury.
-
State v. Williams
8 So. 3d 3
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 4/26/05) , , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), and 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), .
-
State v. Myers
981 So. 2d 214
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 4/26/05) , , writs denied, 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), and 05-1640 (La.2/3/06), [25] State v. Olivieri, 03-563 (La.App.