Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Diggs, 937 So. 2d 376.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marcus Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Davian Bessard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
9/22/16), ], this court expanded its holding in Oliver, supra, by finding that the filing of the state’s answer to an outstanding motion for bill of particulars negated the trial court’s need for ruling on the motion, and suspension of the prescriptive period ends upon the filing of said answer.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Javontae Dshawn Powell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
9/22/16), ], this court expanded its holding in Oliver, supra, by finding that the filing of the state’s answer to an outstanding motion for bill of particulars negated the trial court’s need for ruling on the motion, and suspension of the prescriptive period ends upon the filing of said answer.
State v. Thomas 223 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Barnett 174 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
P. Art. 580; State v. Jackson, 40,376 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-0442 (La.09/22/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Rejena S. Prosen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
9/22/06), the second circuit stated: The curtilage of a home, that “area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life,” is considered part of the home itself and is therefore afforded Fourth Amendment protection.
State of Louisiana v. Johnathan L. Prosen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
9/22/06), the second circuit stated: The curtilage of a home, that “area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life,” is considered part of the home itself and is therefore afforded Fourth Amendment protection.
State v. Prosen 19 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 12/14/05), , *593 writ denied, 06-441 (La.9/22/06), , the second circuit stated: The curtilage of a home, that “area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life,” is considered part of the home itself and is therefore afforded Fourth Amendment protection.
State v. Prosen 19 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-441 (La.9/22/06), , the second circuit stated: The curtilage of a home, that “area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life,” is considered part of the home itself and is therefore afforded Fourth Amendment protection.
State v. Conway 992 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 12/14/05), , writ denied, 2006-0441 (La.9/22/06), .
State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Stephens, 40,343 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-0441 (La.09/22/06), .
State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-0442 (La.9/22/06), .
State v. Warren 949 So. 2d 1215 La. 2007
2 Cir. 12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-0441 (La.9/22/06), .
State v. Wallace 950 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.12/14/05), , writ denied, 06-0441 (La.09/22/06), .