Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Flash v. Louisiana Western R., 68 So. 636.

16 citing documents.

Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 261 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Chatman v. Martin 245 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
Gonzales v. Succession of Medica 141 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Goodwin v. El Dorado Baking Co. 31 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Burthlong v. Huber 4 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
inor children, the right of action shall accrue to both the widow and minor children; provided further, that the right of action shall accrue to the major children only in those cases where there [is] no surviving widow or minor child or children" To cure the palpable error of the Legislature, made evident by a subsequent decision of our Supreme Court ( , 68 So.
Thompson v. Travelers Ins. Co. 182 So. 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Johnson v. Sundbery 150 So. 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
740 , the court said, referring to the case, , 68 So.
Reed v. Warren 136 So. 59 La. 1931
In the concluding sentence of the amendment, providing that the survivors above mentioned might recover also the damages suffered by them, the Legislature repeated the error which had been made in the act of 1884, of including the words “or husband.” , 68 So, 636 , L. R. A. 1916E, 112; where it was decided that the husband had no right of action for damages for the death of his wife, hilled by a railroad train, the husband being not one of “the survivors above mentioned” in the statute.
Moulin v. Monteleone 115 So. 447 La. 1927
hildren a right of action for damages for the loss of the services and support and companionship and affections of the husband and father, withheld such a right of action from the husband for the loss of the services or support or companionship or’ affections of the wife, until the adoption of the Act 159 of 1918, , 68 So.
Stephenson v. N. O. Ry. & L. Co. 7 La. App. 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Kerner v. Trans-Mississippi Terminal R. Co. 104 So. 740 La. 1925
Kerner v. Trans-Mississippi Terminal Railroad 1 La. App. 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
Jones v. Powell Lumber Co. 101 So. 135 La. 1924
Thompson v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 83 So. 19 La. 1919
The Payne Case was referred to approvingly in Flash v. Louisiana Western R. R. Co. , 68 South.
Badie v. Columbia Brewing Co. 77 So. 768 La. 1918
The jurisprudence on that subject, holding to a strict construction of the statute, , 68 South.
Green v. New Orleans, S. & G. I. R. 74 So. 717 La. 1917