Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Harper, 957 So. 2d 136.

13 citing documents.

State v. Brown 42 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See also State v. Canezaro, 07-668 (La.06/01/07), .
State v. SURTAIN 31 So. 3d 1037 La. 2010
State v. Canezaro, 2007-0668 p. 5-6 (La.6/1/07), .
State v. Brown 33 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
a vehicular search incident to arrest was approved by the La.
State v. Young 997 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Canezaro, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/1/07), ; State v. Hill, 99-1021 (La.App.
State v. Conway 992 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.6/1/07), (per curiam).
State v. Chatman 981 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.06/01/07), .
State v. Jerome 983 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
The appellant argues, citing State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.6/1/07), , ( per curiam ), that state protection is broader than federal protection in cases of illegal search and seizure.
State v. Stoutes 980 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
[22] State v. Canezaro, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/1/07), .
State v. James 975 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2127 , 158 L.Ed.2d 905 (2004); State v. Canezaro, 07-668 (La.06/01/07), ; State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.02/22/07), .
State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.6/1/07), (per curiam), the case cited by the State in support of its search incident to an arrest argument, involved the search of the passenger compartment of a vehicle, not the vehicle's trunk.
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2127 , 158 L.Ed.2d 905 (2004); State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.6/1/07), ; State v. Kelley, supra; State v. Lawrence, 40,278 (La.App.
State v. Cox 963 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
The evidence was allowed because it was objectively reasonable for the officer to require a vehicular occupant out of any vehicle, for officer safety, 8 and thus the evidence would have been seen anyway; and • State v. Canezaro, 2007-668 (La.6/1/07), —Even though the officer categorized his search of a passenger compartment as being pursuant to an inventory, the court held itself not bound by the officer’s categorization, and allowed the items secured into evidence, as being the product of an ob
State v. Thigpen 963 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); State v. Canezaro, 2007-0688 (La.6/1/07), .