Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Department of Police, 954 So. 2d 144.

16 citing documents.

Connie Jordan v. Rapides Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/5/07), (quoting Palace, 839 So.2d at 91), this court stated with regard to the trial court’s discretion: If a party objects to the offered testimony of a witness not listed on the pre-trial order, a trial judge has great discretion in deciding whether to receive or refuse the testimony objected to on the
Jordan v. Rapides Regional Medical Center 153 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 1/24/07), , writ denied, 07-409 (La.4/5/07), (quoting Palace, 839 So.2d at 91 ), this court stated with regard to the trial court’s discretion: If a party objects to the offered testimony of a witness not listed on the pre-trial order, a trial judge has great discretion in deciding whether to receive or refuse the testimony objected to on the grounds of failure
Marvin W. Buxton v. William Corbello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Buxton v. Corbello 82 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-408 (La.4/5/07), .
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Flowers Baking Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4/5/07), this court set forth both the burden of proof and the appellate standard of review applicable to the instant matter as follows: “The burden of proof on the prescription issue lies with the party asserting it; however, where the petition shows on its face that the claim has prescribed, the
Zeno v. Flowers Baking Co. 62 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-408 (La.4/5/07), , this court set forth both the burden of proof and the appellate standard of review applicable to the instant matter as follows: “The burden of proof on the prescription issue lies with the party asserting it; however, where the petition shows on its face that the claim has prescribed, the burden shifts to the plaint
James Jason, III v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/5/07), explaining: It has long been held that, in general, the observations and opinions of the treating physician are to be accorded greater weight than those of a physician who has only seen the party for purposes of rendering an expert opinion concerning the party’s condition.
Jason v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency 27 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/24/07), -20 , writ denied, 07-409 (La.4/5/07), , explaining: It has long been held that, in general, the observations and opinions of the treating physician are to be accorded greater weight than those of a physician who has only seen the party for purposes of rendering an expert opinion concerning the party’s condition.
Dave Beach v. Cna La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Beach v. Continental Casualty Co. 11 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , , writ denied, 07-408 (La.4/5/07), .
Shannon Menard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Menard v. Lafayette Insurance 13 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/24/07), -20 , writ denied, 07-409 (La.4/5/07), .
Michael Vidrine v. Teche Electric Supply, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Vidrine v. Teche Electric Supply, L.L.C. 6 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/24/07), -20 , writ denied, 07-409 (La.4/5/07), .
Explained Mouton v. Walgreen Co. 981 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 1/24/07), -20 , writ denied, 07-409 (La.4/5/07), , we explained: [I]n general, the observations and opinions of the treating physician are to be accorded greater weight than those of a physician who has only seen the party for purposes of rendering an expert opinion concerning the party's condition.
Explained Alyce Mouton v. Walgreen Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4/5/07), we explained: [I]n general, the observations and opinions of the treating physician are to be accorded greater weight than those of a physician who has only seen the party for purposes of rendering an expert opinion concerning the party’s condition.