Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen Self Insurers Fund v. Dani's Catfish & Steak House, I…, 955 So. 2d 692.

19 citing documents.

Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
Dustin Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07)
Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service 100 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), .
Philip Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03–1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest e
Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 94 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/27/07), (alteration in original): In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s finding
Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), (alteration in original): In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
George Keith Day v. Superior Derrick Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Day v. Superior Derrick Services 80 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), .
Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. 56 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), ).
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Triad Electric & Controls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Trent v. Triad Electric & Controls, Inc. 34 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/7/07) , , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), .
Kenneth Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/27/07), (quoting Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., ).
Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, LLC 30 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), (quoting Br uno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., ).
Roshawn Pete v. Quality Construction Specialists La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 4/27/07), (quoting Hubbard v. Allied Bldg.
Pete v. Quality Construction Specialists & Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 25 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied,, 07-507 (La .4/27/07), (quoting Hubbard v. Allied Bldg.
Bobby L. Shirley v. J & S Dozer Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Shirley v. J & S DOZER SERVICES, INC. 12 So. 3d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/7/07), 479 , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), .
David Bailey v. Aecom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by