Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Jones, 955 So. 2d 693.

14 citing documents.

Demetric Tanner v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 12/13/06), writ denied, 07–510 (La.4/27/07), this court followed the reasoning of Whatley and found that the DOTD was not entitled to notice of defective signage that it created.
Tanner v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol. Gov't 273 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4/27/07), , this court followed the reasoning of Whatley and found that the DOTD was not entitled to notice of defective signage that it created.
Edwards ex rel. Edwards v. Parkerson 218 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
04/27/07), (in which the court held that there must be at least a principal-agent relationship to fall within the purview of La.
Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC) 114 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
3d Cir.02/07/07), , writ denied, 07-0515 (La.04/27/07), .
Ryan George v. Horace McBride La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/27/07), this court followed the reasoning of Whatley and found that the DOTD was not entitled to notice of defective 6 signage that it created.
George v. McBride 40 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/13/06), , writ denied, 07-510 (La.4/27/07), .
Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/13/06) , , writ denied, 07-510 (La.4/27/07), , this court followed the reasoning of Whatley and found that the DOTD was not entitled to notice of defective |7 signage that it created.
Dennis Mulvihill v. Irwin Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Mulvihill v. Martin 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Jacqueline Morrell v. Alton Fisher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/27/07), this court discussed the appellate standard of review with regard to jury instructions: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructio
Morrell v. Fisher 7 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 12/13/06), , writ denied, 07-510 (La.4/27/07), , this court discussed the appellate standard of review with regard to jury instructions: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
Mary Faye O'quin v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
O'Quin v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. 967 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 12/13/06) , , writ denied, 07-510 (La.4/27/07), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by