George v. Paffen
George v. Paffen, 966 So. 2d 562 (La. 2007).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana Versus Liovel Granado-Gonzalez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State v. Fair 182 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Andres 100 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Babineaux 8 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Bradford v. Coody 6 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Opinion text
In re George, Robin; George, Kenneth M. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-CA-890. Writ Granted. The plaintiffs have presented evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the land *563 lord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities. The appellate court decision to affirm the trial court’s summary judgment is reversed; the trial court’s summary judgment is vacated and set aside; this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this writ disposition. TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.