Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ramirez, 976 So. 2d 204.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Lionel Serigne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State v. Brown 240 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 1/9/08), , 207.
State v. Brown 193 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Pierre 192 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Brown 161 So. 3d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1/9/08), ; State v. Love, 00-3347, pp. 9-10 (La.5/23/03), .
State v. West 154 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jones 144 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Major 140 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 State v. Ramirez, 07-0652, p. 4 (La.1/9/08), , citing State v. Love, 00-3347, pp. 9-10 (La.5/23/07), .
State v. Thomas 138 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Gregory 137 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Kelly 133 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1/9/08), ; State v. Love, 2000-3347, pp. 9-10 (La.5/23/07), (“[b]e-cause the complementary role of trial courts and appellate courts demands that deference be given to a trial court’s discretionary decision, an appellate court is allowed to preverse a trial court judgment on a motion to quash only if
State v. Lawson 129 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/9/08), *795 207 ().
State v. Williams 101 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 1/9/08), ; State v. Love, 00-3347, pp. 9-10 (La.5/23/03), (“[bjecause the complementary role of trial courts and appellate courts demands that deference be given to a trial court’s discretionary decision, an appellate court is allowed to reverse a trial court judgment on a motion to quash only if that
State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dillon 72 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010