Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lafayette Professional Firefighters Ass'n v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, 978 So. 2d 327.

20 citing documents.

Danny Ray Gilcrease v. Maximus Operating, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
4/4/08), Ashby v. IMC Exploration Co., 496 So.
Castex Development, LLC v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Castex Development, LLC v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
August Levert, Jr., Family, LLC Ronald R. Levert Paul M. Levert Mark W. Levert, Jr. John E. Sanford … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
4/ 4/ 08), Broussard v. Northcott Exploration Co., Inc., 481 So.
Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Dixon Management Corp., Kenmore Oil Co., … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Litel Explorations, L.L.C. v. Aegis Development Company, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Grace Ranch, LLC v. Bp America Production Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4/4/08), wherein this court agreed that it is “impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease.” This court noted: Although LeJeune Brothers argues it acquired the property from the mineral lessor, since the lease had expired at least two years before Baez sold the proper
Grace Ranch, LLC v. BP Am. Prod. Co. 252 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/4/08), , wherein this court agreed that it is "impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease."
Glenn Bernard v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/4/08), wherein we rejected a landowner’s argument that the failure to remove oilfield exploration and production waste wrongfully deposited on his property constituted a continuing 6 tort.
Bernard v. City of Marksville 154 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 3 Cir. 11/28/07), , writ denied, 08-298 (La.4/4/08), , *1250 wherein we rejected a landowner’s argument that the failure to remove oilfield exploration and production waste wrongfully deposited on his property constituted a continuing |7tort.
Carlos Boone, Et Ux. v. Conoco Phillips Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/4/08), the court compared the lease at issue to the lease in Broussard and found no stipulation pour autrui in favor of the plaintiffs: As in Broussard, the damage clause in the Baez Lease was similarly modified.
Boone v. Conoco Phillips Co. 139 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 11/28/07), , writ denied, 08-298 (La.4/4/08), , the court compared the lease at issue to the lease in Broussard and found no stipulation pour autrui in favor of the plaintiffs: As in Broussard , the damage clause in the Baez Lease was similarly modified.
John C. Duck v. Hunt Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/4/08), a case that was decided before Eagle Pipe, this court considered whether a property owner was a third-party beneficiary to a mineral lease entered into between his predecessor in interest and a well operator so as to maintain a contract action against the well operator for damages to the property that resulted fr
Duck v. Hunt Oil Co. 134 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 11/28/07) , , writ denied, 08-298 (La.4/4/08), , a case that was decided before Eagle Pipe, this court considered whether a property owner was a third-party beneficiary to a mineral lease entered into between his prede *121 cessor in interest and a well operator so as to maintain a contract action against the well operator for damages to the property that resulted
Wagoner v. CHEVRON USA INC. 55 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
3d Cir.11/28/07), , writ denied, 08-0298 (La.04/04/08), .
Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 11/28/07), , writ denied, 08-298(La.4/4/08), , is misplaced.
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
3 Cir. 11/28/07) , , writ denied, 08-298 (La.4/4/08), , (La.App.
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. 45 So. 3d 991 La. 2010
3 Cir. 11/28/07) , , writ denied, 08-0298 (La.4/4/08), , the court of appeal rejected a landowner’s argument that the failure to remove oilfield exploration and production waste wrongfully deposited on the landowner’s property constituted a continuing tort.