Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tranchant v. State, 5 So. 3d 832.

23 citing documents.

Lanell E. Darouse v. P.J.'s Coffee of New Orleans, LLC and New Orleans Roast, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Donald Ray Singletary, Jr. v. Michael B. Cooper, individually and as Chief Executive Officer Of the St. Tammany … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Chrystal Kaufman Versus Dr. Daniel Deakter La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Ashley N. Miller and Drusilla Parker v. Joseph P. Hirstius and American Alternative Insurance Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Richard Hollyfield v. Amanda Tullos, M.D. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
1/21/09), ).8 The Brown Court set forth that “[i]f a medical malpractice plaintiff may name an individual physician state health care provider as a defendant, it is axiomatic that service may be requested on this individual pursuant to La.
Albertine Billizone v. Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Sheriff of the Parish of Jefferson and Justin Jerry La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Steven Spillman v. Deputy Parker and Sheriff Jay Russell Ex Officio as Sheriff of Ouachita Parish and Travelers … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Donna M. Gilly, Wife of/and Kurt Kleindienst Versus James E. Ricciardi, M.D., Lsu Healthcare Network and Board of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Nyles Walker v. Goauto Insurance Company, James River Insurance, Raiser, LLC and Joy Brue La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
1/21/09), the Louisiana Supreme Court said that: To resolve the legal question presented by this case, we must determine what is required to constitute a request for service.
Donna Brown v. Ralph Chesson, M.D. La. 2021
Roderick Vaughn Dominick Jr. v. Grambling State University by and through the Board of Supervisors for the University … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Eugene v. Duroncelet 275 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/21/09), , the plaintiffs mailed a letter requesting service within 90 days of the commencement of the action pursuant to La.
Lois Eugene Versus Brett Duroncelet, Waste Connection, Inc., and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1/21/09), the plaintiffs mailed a letter requesting service within 90 days of the commencement of the action pursuant to La.
Lathan Co. v. Division of Administration 272 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/21/09), , 836, the supreme court was called to determine whether a request for service is deemed made when a letter containing service instructions is mailed or when it is received by the clerk's office.
Velasquez v. Chesson 151 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
Tranchant v. State, 08-0978, p. 10 (La.1/21/09), (“[Pjlaintiffs are strictly held to the obligation of serving the correct agent for service of process, [] as well as to the obligation of serving the named state defendants within the time period |4specified by La.
Maretta Benoit v. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Stringfellow v. Johnson 113 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
8 Defendants also urge that we affirm the dismissal based on the holdings in Tran-ehant v. State, 2008-0978 (La.1/21/09), .
Morales v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors ex rel. Earl K. Long Medical Center 106 So. 3d 104 La. 2013
In Tranchant v. State of Louisiana, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 08-0978, p. 7 (La.1/21/09), , we discussed the requirements for a valid request for service, finding “[a] valid request for service under La.
Donald Burgo v. Warden Robert Henderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/21/09), (citation omitted).
Jones v. Iberville Parish Council 111 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Tranchant v. State, 08-0978 (La.1/21/09), .
Morales v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors 104 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Tranchant v. State, 2008-0978 (La.1/21/09), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the question of what constitutes a “request” for service pursuant to La.
Burge v. State 43 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Pate v. Regional Transit Authority 8 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Tranchant v. State, 08-0978, p. 7 (La.01/21/09), , very recently reiterated the Johnson requirement: Service upon the defendant pursuant to La.