Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Helvik v. State, 993 So. 2d 1277.

15 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Edgar M. Hidalgo La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    10/10/08), this Court stated that although there were some inconsistencies between the victim’s statements during his CAC interview and his testimony at trial, the jury’s decision to believe the victim’s account of events over the defendant’s testimony was rational.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    10/10/08); where the defendant argued that the victims’ testimony should not have been believed because of inconsistencies.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    10/10/08); where the defendant argued that the victims’ testimonies should not have been believed because of inconsistencies.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tony Garnell Pennywell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/10/08), the defendant was convicted of 19 two counts of aggravated rape.
  • State v. Pennywell 139 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 11/13/07) , , writ denied, 08-156 (La.10/10/08), , the defendant was convicted of |9,ntwo counts of aggravated rape.
  • State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 11/13/07) , , writ denied, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), ; State v. Morgan, 06-529 (La.App.
  • State v. Lampkin 119 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Gaddis v. State, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), .
  • State v. Granger 103 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 11/13/07), , writ denied, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), ; State v. Morgan, 06-529, p. 23 (LaApp.
  • State v. Richoux 101 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 11/13/07) , , writ denied, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), , this Court found the victim’s testimony was enough to establish oral sexual intercourse.
  • State v. Nguyen 88 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Miller 84 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 11/13/07) , -28 , writ denied, 08-156 (La.10/10/08), , the defendant argued the victims’ testimony should not have been believed because of inconsistencies.
  • State v. Perkins 78 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 11/13/07) , , writ denied, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), ; State v. Morgan, 06-529 (La.App.
  • State v. Ross 28 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 11/13/07), , writ denied, 08-0156 (La.10/10/08), .
  • State v. Smallwood 20 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 11/13/07), , writ denied, 08-156 (La.10/10/08), .
  • State v. Bedoya 998 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    5 Cir. 11/13/07), , writ denied, 08-156 (La.10/10/08), ; State v. Stevenson, 00-1296, p. 4 (La.App.