No. 2010 CJ 1185
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. E.F.
State ex rel. E.F., 49 So. 3d 575 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.S., Y.M., A.M., E.M., and K.M La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of L.P. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State ex rel. K.K. 243 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
- State ex rel. T. B. 202 So. 3d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Opinion text
HUGHES, J., concurring. |,I agree with the result reached by the trial court, but I object to a requirement that the parents explain how the injuries occurred. Parenting classes, drug testing, anger management, future safeguards, etc., are all proper elements of a case plan. In my opinion, “confess” is not. The medical evidence is sufficient to justify the result.