No. 2010-B-1547
Precedential
Processed
In re Stanford
In re Stanford, 50 So. 3d 151 (La. 2010).
Cited by
- In Re: Peggy M. Hairston Robinson La. 2017
- In re Nelson 146 So. 3d 176 La. 2014
Opinion text
GUIDRY, J., dissents. |,I do not agree that respondent’s misconduct is prescribed and that the formal charges should be dismissed. Rather, I would reject respondent’s prescription defense and impose a public reprimand. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.