Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America, 52 So. 3d 68.
-
Christus Health Southwest Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Patrick Hospital v. All About You Home Healthcare, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
11/30/10), see also, Benoit v. Turner Indus.
- Park Place Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Nat'l Oilwell Varco, L.P. 250 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Park Place Surgery Center D/B/A Park Place Surgical Hospital (Brian Armstead) v. National Oilwell Varco, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Olympia Minerals, LLC v. Hs Resources, Inc. 171 So. 3d 878 La. 2014
- Christus Health Central Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital (Eric J. Manuel) v. Westaff (Usa), Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Christus Health Central Louisiana v. Westaff (USA), Inc.
125 So. 3d 1120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
LWCC argues that the amount of reimbursement that the relator is willing to accept from other payors is relevant to these cases, citing Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America, 10-800 (La.11/30/10), .
-
Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC
85 So. 3d 629
La. 2012
23:1033 provides, “[n]o contract, rule, regulation or device whatsoever shall operate to 18relieve the employer, in whole or in part, from any liability created by this Chapter except as herein provided.” We recently interpreted these statutes in Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America, 10-800 (La.11/30/10), , wherein a health care provider filed suit against an employer, seeking a determination of the validity of preferred provider organization (“PPO”) contracts, whereby an employer pays a
-
Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.
58 So. 3d 441
La. 2011
See, e.g., Agilus Health (Taylor) v. Accor Lodging North America, 2010-0800, p. 6 n. 4, (“because this issue was not raised in connection to this writ application, we will not reach it in this opinion.”).
-
Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Al Copeland Investments
53 So. 3d 556
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The issue of the legality, vel non, of PPO contracts whereby an employer pays a health care provider for services rendered to an injured employee at a negotiated amount below that statutorily provided by the LWCA’s reimbursement schedule has now been decided by our supreme court in its recent decision of Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North American, 10-800 (La.11/30/10), .