Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 60 So. 3d 600.

24 citing documents.

Convention Key Cards, LLC D/B/A Key Marketing v. Lmt Services, LLC D/B/A Papa Johns Pizza La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
4/29/11), Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc., 2015-0477 (La.
David Gniady v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
4/29/11), (citing Nicholas v. Allstate Ins.
Nickie Lejeune v. Kayla Fontenot, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, p. 2 (La.4/29/11), held that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.
City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Torrey Lewis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In Re: The Medical Review Panel of Henrietta Houck v. Baton Rouge General Medical Center La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Poule D'Eau Properties, LLC v. TLC Properties, Inc. and the Lamar Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Mark Wheeler v. Louisiana Peace Officer Standards and Training Council La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/29/11), (“[W]e have held that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.”), when the parties are disputing contractual indemnity provisions, based in part on assignments of fault as allocated by the trier of fact, does the court of appeal have the authority to rea
Faubourg Marigny Improvement Ass'n v. City of New Orleans 195 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Having reviewed the actual judgment, and ‘having requested supplemental briefing from the parties on the issue of “irreparable injury,” see Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, pp. 2-3 (La.4/29/11), -603 , we conclude that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the Improvement Association’s request for a preliminary injunction.
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2129, 2164 (“The appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.”); Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, p. 2 (La.4/29/11), ("Based on these codal authorities, we have held that an appellate court has, the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.”).
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2129, 2164 ("The appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.”); Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, p. 2 (La.4/29/11), ("Based on these codal authorities, we have held that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.”).
Weatherly v. Sanchez 181 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Rule 1.3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal; Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, pp. 2-3 (La.4/29/11), .
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 181 So. 3d 656 La. 2015
4/29/11), Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.
Tamba McIntire Wells v. Fruth, Jamison & Elsass, Pllc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/29/11), held that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.
Wells v. Fruth, Jamison & Elsass, PLLC 158 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2 (La.4/29/11), , held that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue even when there is no assignment of error.
Stevens v. City of Shreveport 152 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2010-2827 (La.4/29/11), .- Where pro se litigants are concerned, in the interest of justice, this court will read pro se filings indulgently and attempt to construe a brief as though assignments of error were properly made.
Morgan v. Morgan 153 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2010-2827 (La.4/29/11), ; Nicholas v. Allstate Ins.
Parker v. Plaquemines Parish Government 101 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 2129; Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827 (La.4/29/11), .
Armstrong ex rel. R.D. v. Johnson 97 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2129 and 2164, and Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827 (La.4/29/11), , we directed that the parties file supplemental briefs on whether a dismissal ordered under La.
Succession of DiLeo 90 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2124 and 2129, and Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827 (La.4/29/11), .
Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co. 89 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although Pacific did not specifically address the coinsurance issue in its brief, it is implicitly addressed; the Supreme Court in Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, p. 2 (La.4/29/11), , stated that an appellate court has the authority to consider an issue when there is no assignment of error.
Elfers v. AIG National Insurance 80 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
But also see Merrill v. Greyhound, 10-2827 (La.4/29/11), .
In Re Helm 84 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10-2827, p. 2 (La.4/29/11), .
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 70 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 11/24/10) , , vacated, 2010-2827 (La.4/29/11), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by