Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. King, 60 So. 3d 615.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Samir Melendez La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Cruz Matute La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Johnson La. 2021
5/6/11), (per curiam); State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin M. Williams Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 6/ 11), (per curiam).
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Johnson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 6/ 11), ( per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Fred Reimonenq La. 2019
5/6/11), (per curiam); State v. Batiste, 05-1571, (La.
State v. Papizan 256 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/6/11), , 618 ( per curiam ); State v. Batiste , 05-1571, p. 5 (La.
State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. King, 10-2638 (La.5/6/11), .
State v. Quinn 136 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1/18/12), (citing State v. King, 2010-2638 pp. 7-8 (La.5/6/11), -620 ).
State v. Mathews 109 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Court reaffirmed this holding in State v. King, 10-2638 (La.5/6/11), , where it found that the trial court erred by quashing the bill of information when there was no showing that the state “sought a tactical advantage over the defense.” Id.
State v. Bell 106 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. King, 10-2638, pp. 7-8 (La.5/6/11), ; State v. Scott, 04-1142, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Brown, 11-0947, p. 6, , citing State v. King, 10- *626 2638, p. 6 (La.5/6/11), .
State v. Keeling 96 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
| fiThe Supreme Court, in State v. King, 2010-2638 (La.5/6/11), , noted the “frequent collisions between a trial court’s inherent authority to conduct criminal proceedings ‘in an orderly and expeditious manner,’ ” La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Luther 91 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State *562 v. King, 10-2638 (La.5/6/11), .
State v. Williams 89 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed this reasoning in State v. King, 2010-2638 (La.5/6/11), .
State v. Durham 90 So. 3d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See, State v. King, 10-2638, pp. 5-6 (La.5/6/11), (per curiam).
State v. Brown 88 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. King, 10-2638 (La.5/6/11), .
State v. Lee 80 So. 3d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
” State v. King, 2010-2638, pp. 7-8 (La.5/6/11), -20 (citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct.
State v. Hayes 75 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. King, 10-2638, p. 5 (La.5/6/11), (per curiam).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by