Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Peters, 60 So. 3d 672.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 2 Cir. 2/16/11), writ denied, 11-0494 (La.
State v. Pike 273 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 679, writ denied , 11-0494 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Billy Dean Cotten La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Cotten 241 So. 3d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (citing as examples State v. Santee, 2002-0693 at p. 4, 834 So.2d at 534-35 , and State v. Wolfe, 98-0345, pp. 6-7 (La.App.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hickman 194 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 2/16/11), ; State v. Hailey, 2002-1738, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Lambert 191 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (“Here, the likelihood of misidentification is not present.
State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), ; State v. Santee, 2002-0693, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Miorana 156 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 678 writ denied, 2011-0494 (La.9/30/11), .
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (“Here, the likelihood of misidentification is not present.
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Augustine 131 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), ; State v. Hailey, 02-1738, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , writ denied, 11-0494 (La.9/30/11), .
State v. Taylor 64 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 2/16/11) , , the failure to rule on the motion to reconsider sentence does not preclude review of the defendant’s conviction.