Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rubens, 83 So. 3d 30.

38 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Demyron L. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
4 Cir. 11/30/11), writ denied, 12-374 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
4 Cir. 11/30/11), writ denied, 12-374 (La.
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), ).
State of Louisiana v. Samuel M. Hunter Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), ().
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), (citing State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Marie Alfred A/K/A Elizabeth Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 11/30/11), writ denied, 12-374 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Duck La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), writ denied, 12-0374 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Antoine Edwards La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), –67, writ denied, 2012–0374 (La.5/25/12), writ denied, State ex rel.
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Terell Fisher, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4th Cir. 11/ 30/ 11), - 53, writs denied, 2012- 0374 ( La.
State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), , 66-67, as follows: Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are reviewed under the two-part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Daniels 262 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), , 38.
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), , 46, quoting State v. Lafleur , , 1080 (La.1981).
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4th Cir. 11/30/11), , 52-53, writs denied , 12-0374 (La.
State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), , 66-67 ).
State v. Murray 223 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 11/30/11), , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 11/30/11), -67 .
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 11/30/11), , quoting State v. Huckabay, 00-1082, pp. 25-26 (La.App.
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , as follows: As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , this court reviewed the jurisprudence *786 on ineffective assistance of counsel, as follows: ■ [“As a general rule,' claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , as follows: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4th Cir.11/30/11), , writs denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), & 2012-0399 (La.10/12/12), , cert.
State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/30/11) ; , writs denied, 12-0374 (La.5/25/12); and 12-399 (La.10/12/12); , where the defendant was procedurally barred from raising issue of unconstitutionality of non-unanimous jury verdict where the record did not reflect that defendant objected to the jury instruction under La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/30/11), (quoting State v. Huckabay, 00-1082, p. 25-26 (La.App.
State v. Watson 147 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/30/11), , writ denied, 12-0374 (La.5/25/12), , and writ denied sub nom., State ex rel.
State v. Wells 156 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 .
State v. Ross 137 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Henderson 136 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , , the defendant, Peter Rubens, was convicted of the second degree murder of his acquaintance, Robert Irwin.
State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , , units denied, 12-374 (La.5/25/12), and 12-399 (La.10/12/12), , cert, denied,U.S.-, 133 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , writ denied, 12-0374 (La.5/25/12), , as follows: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (
State v. Mercadel 120 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), , writ denied, State ex rel.
State v. Curtis 112 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 *334 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), .
State v. Galle 107 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/30/11), -51 , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), (quoting and following Bertrand on this issue); State v. Boudreaux, 2008-1504, p. 38 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -50 .
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , , writ denied, 12-0374 (La.5/25/12), .
State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), , as follows: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15
State v. Anderson 85 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , , when rejecting the same argument defendant makes here.