No. 2011-C-0627 Precedential Reinstated Processed

Wright v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 20, 2011 · 63 So. 3d 972

The holding in the court’s own words

Based on our de novo review, we conclude there is a disputed issue as to whether coverage exits under the policy issued by Continental Casualty Company to Dr. Tedesco. For this reason, we conclude the court of appeal erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the insurer.

View full opinion text ↓

Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.

Cited by

State of Louisiana v. Jessie James Duplantis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Duplantis 127 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. William Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 130 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Daye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Richard 115 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Preston 103 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Edwin N. Rivera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011

Opinion text

In re Wright, Dewayne Wesley; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 447,182; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,810-CW. Writ granted. Based on our de novo review, we conclude there is a disputed issue as to whether coverage exits under the policy issued by Continental Casualty Company to Dr. Tedesco. For this reason, we conclude the court of appeal erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the insurer. See La.C.C.P. art. 966(B). Accordingly, the court of appeal ruling is reversed, and the trial court’s judgment denying the motion for summary judgment is reinstated. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.