Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 79 So. 3d 978.

55 citing documents.

H. Edward Sherman v. Old Point Bar, Point Investment Company, Inc., Warren P. Munster, Jr., Dale Edward Triguero, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
12/6/11), (citation omitted).
Sheila Richard Malcolm v. Jason Ray Goodwin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
12/6/11), in which the supreme court found that a letter sent by defendant Oilfield Heavy Haulers to plaintiff Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development scheduling a Rule 10.1 discovery conference constituted a step precluding abandonment.
Allen Dehart v. Bruce A. Jones, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. Allen Bickham La. 2024
William Coury Moss and Sarah James Moss v. Sugarland Exterminating and Chemical Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Harmonia LLC v. Felicity Properties Co, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Milton Davis v. Paul P. Naquin, Jr., Lisa C. Morgan, Henry C. Langrange, St. Mary Parish Government and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Billy and Tonya Burkette, individually and on behalf of their minor child, DB v. Central Community School System La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Gina Moise, Robert Southard, Jr. and Kevin Southard, Individually and on behalf of Betty Sue Southard (D) v. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Mona Lisa J. Benjamin v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Gilda R. Small v. Ar Scientific La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
12/6/11), –82, the supreme court discussed the purpose and history of abandonment, explaining: The purpose of Article 561 is the prevention of protracted litigation filed for purposes of harassment or without a serious intent to hasten the claim to judgment.
Christopher Lee Williams v. Capital One, National Association, Capital One Bank (Usa), National Association, Danielle Williams, Rudy Gorrell, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
12/6/11), (Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Roubion Shoring Company, LLC and Roubion Construction Co., LLC Versus Crescent Shoring, L.L.C., Christopher Lytle, Alan J. Tucker … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Mrs. Salvatore Paul Provenza, Sr., Salvatore Paul Provenza, Jr., Victoria C. Provenza, and the Unopened Succession of Salvatore … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
12/6/11), Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Sheila Williams v. Angela [april] Montgomery, And La. 2021
Jessie Gilbert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
12/ 6/ 11), citing Delta Dev.
Sheila Williams v. Angela Montgomery and Foremost Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Shawn Morgan v. West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Department, Eric J. Morales, in his official capacity as a … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Whitney Chelsey Randall v. Owen Andrew Bercegeay La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Arthur Truitt, Individually and as Administrator of the Estates of the Minor Children Derek Truitt, Shaunda Truitt, and … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
12/6/11); citing Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Charles R. Talen, II v. Rhino Rhencovators, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
12/6/11), -82, the supreme court discussed the purpose and history of abandonment, explaining: The purpose of Article 561 is the prevention of protracted litigation filed for purposes of harassment or without a serious intent to hasten the claim to judgment.
Rixner v. Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc. 270 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Juengain v. Tervalon 223 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Estate of Rowe 224 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/6/11), ; Hibernia Nat’l Bank v. Aero-Mech, supra.
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. Energy Development Corp. 218 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Savoie v. Larmarque Ford, Inc. 205 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
12/6/11), ; Gambino v. Standard Fire Ins.
D.W. Thomas & Son, Inc. v. Gregory 210 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
12/06/11), ; Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Hibernia National Bank v. Aero-Mech, Inc. 215 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 2011-0912 (La.12/6/11), .
Gordon v. Gordon 195 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912, p. 7 (La.12/6/11), .
Lewis v. Jones 193 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
DOTH v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912 (La.12/06/11), *551 979 , allege that defense counsel’s participation in the Rule 10.1 conference was sufficient to waive abandonment.
State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of Community Development v. Tujague 193 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912 (La.12/6/11), .
Claiborne Medical Corp. v. ABC Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C. , 11-0912 (La.12/6/11), .
Succession of Linda Aymond Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Bryon P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. 165 So. 3d 875 La. 2015
12/6/11), we held that a letter scheduling a Rule 10.1 conference “serves as a step in the prosecution or defense of an action, as it is an essential component of a motion to compel.” However, we made a specific finding that the letter at issue was served on all defendants.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales and Use Tax Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
12/6/11), which involved an action by the defendant.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales & Use Tax Dept. 157 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
DOTD v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-912 (La.12/6/11), , which involved an action by the defendant.
Distinguished Mallet v. Parish of Iberville 162 So. 3d 369 La. 2015
and Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912 (La.12/6/11), , because plaintiffs failed to establish defendant had notice of the December 14, 2012 letter.
Bell v. Louisiana State Police 168 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, LLC, 11-0912 (La.12/6/11), .
Delacruz v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 157 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912, p. 5 (La.12/6/11), .
Byron P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
12/6/11), -82, the supreme court discussed the purpose and history of abandonment, explaining: The purpose of Article 561 is the prevention of protracted litigation filed for purposes of harassment or without a serious intent to hasten the claim to judgment.
Guillory v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. 143 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Article 561 provides: “Any formal discovery as authorized by this Code and served on all parties whether or not filed of record, including the taking of a deposition with or without formal notice, shall be deemed to be a step in the prosecution or defense of an action.” In Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-912, pp. 5-6 (La.12/6/11), -82 , the supreme court discussed the purpose and history of abandonment, explaining: The purpose of
Heirs of Bergeron v. B-P Amoco 131 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912, pp. 4-5 (La.12/6/11)), .
George White, Sr. v. Leonard Hataway, Sheriff of Grant Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-912, pp. 4-5 (La.12/6/11), citing Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Wolf Plumbing, Inc. v. Matthews 124 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912 (La.12/06/11), .
Succession of Sigur v. Henritzy 126 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912, p. 5 (La.12/6/11), -82 (citing Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Gambino v. Standard Fire Insurance Co. 110 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 2011-0912, p. 4 (La.12/6/11), .
Dean v. Delacroix Corp. 106 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C., 11-0912, pp. 4-5 (La.12/6/11), , citing Clark v. State Farm Mut.
Murray v. Brown 102 So. 3d 777 La. 2012
Cole's Construction Crews, Inc. v. J-O-B Operating Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/6/11), where this court affirmed the trial court‟s dismissal of a suit as abandoned, holding that neither discovery responses sent by the plaintiff to one defendant in a multi-party suit but not served on all remaining defendants, nor a letter sent by one of the defendants to the plaintiff requesting a Rule 10.1 discovery c