Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Udomeh v. Joseph, 103 So. 3d 343.

19 citing documents.

Laurie Marshall Versus Travis Thurman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
10/26/12), (a wrongful death action).
Gulf Production Company, Inc. v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and Robert Peatross La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. v. Terry White D/B/A The Shop La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
3d 426; Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839 (La 10/26/12)
Lashonda Kuykendall Versus Kimbrough's Inc Pool & Spa Builders, David Kimbrough, Charles Boutin, & Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
10/26/12), that: In order to plead “material facts” within Louisiana's fact-pleading system, the pleader must “state what act or omission he or she will establish at trial, such as the fact the defendant failed to deliver goods by a designated date, exceeded the speed limit, or failed to pay worker
Sheila Broussard Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/26/12), -49 (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated: 13 Louisiana’s Code of Civil Procedure uses a system of pleading based upon the narration of factual allegations.
Joseph Henderson, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Michael Richard, Steadfast Insurance Company, Lyft, Inc., and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
10/26/12), (quoting Greemon v. City of Bossier City, 10-2828, 11-0039, pp. 8-9 (La.
Emanuel Flintroy, Individually and on Behalf of his Daughter, Jessica Wright v. The State of Louisiana Health Science … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
10/26/12), but any such action had to be filed within one year of the child’s death, under La.
The Rapides Parish School Board v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/26/12), supports their peremption claim, Udomeh involved a paternity action in which the purported father failed to request a judgment of paternity within his initial allegations, a pre-requisite to his stating a right of action.
Rain Cii Carbon, L. L.C. v. Recon Eng'g, Inc. 270 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In re Dean 247 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
George Mason, Jr. v. Deanna Harbison Mason La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Zimmerman v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 174 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
art. 865; Udomeh v. Joseph, 2011-2839 (La.10/26/12), .
Watson v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center 163 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co. v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), ; Udomeh v. Joseph, 2011-2839 (La.10/26/12), .
Marcus Miller v. Harold Thibeaux,lafayette Parish School Board and American Alternative Insurance Corporation 159 So. 3d 426 La. 2015
that, since he pled in his petition in the instant case that he was the biological, father of La’Derion, the necessary material facts to constitute an avowal action were alleged, and the defendants were put on notice that he was seeking a judgment of paternity, even though he did not make a specific request for that relief, citing this court’s decision in Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839 (La.10/26/12), .
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
A cause of action has been defined as “the state of facts which gives a party a right to judicially assert an action against the defendant.” Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839, p. 10 (La.10/26/12), , 349 n. 3, quoting Trahan v. Liberty Mut.
Marcus Miller v. Harold J. Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/26/12), explained the requirements with regard to paternal filiation in personal injury suits as follows: 2 To recover under a claim for wrongful death and survival, a plaintiff must fall within the class of persons designated as a beneficiary under La.
Miller v. Thibeaux 153 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme court, in Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839,, pp. 4-5 (La.10/26/12), , explained the requirements with regard to paternal filiation in personal injury suits as follows: | ¡¡To recover under a claim for wrongful death and survival, a plaintiff must fall within the class of persons designated as a beneficiary under La.
Succession of Morris 131 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Mr. Delay cites Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839 (La.11/30/12), , in support of his argument that an administrative proceeding within the Social Security Administration constitutes the institution of an action for purposes of La.
Caceras v. Work 110 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
hi concur with the majority that based on Udomeh v. Joseph, 11-2839 (La.10/26/12), , the district court should not have granted the exception of no right of action.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by