Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martha JACKSON v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO., 63 So. 3d 1037.

61 citing documents.

State v. Sinceno 99 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11) , -50 , writ denied, 11-0338 (La.6/17/11), (citation omitted), where this Court found that a defendant’s flight and attempt to avoid apprehension are circumstances from which a trier of fact may infer a guilty conscience.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher H. Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
6/17/11), the fifth circuit noted: The determination of a defendant‘s culpability rests on a two-old test: 1) whether, given the facts presented, the defendant could reasonably have believed his life to be in imminent danger; and 2) whether deadly force was necessary to prevent the danger.
State v. Joseph 94 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-338 (La.6/17/11), , the fifth circuit noted: The determination of a defendant’s culpability rests on a two-old test: 1) whether, given the facts presented, the defendant could reasonably have believed his life to be in imminent danger; and 2) whether deadly force was necessary to prevent the danger.
State v. Adams 89 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11) , , writ denied, 11-338 (La.6/17/11), .
State v. Massey 97 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11) , , writ denied, 11-0338 (La.6/17/11), .
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-0338 (La.6/17/11), .
State v. King 88 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-338 (La.6/17/11), .
State v. Cornejo-Garcia 90 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-0338 (La.6/17/11), .
State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-0338 (La.6/17/11), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Tanesha Hardy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/17/11), the fifth circuit noted: 4 The determination of a defendant’s culpability rests on a two- fold test: 1) whether, given the facts presented, the defendant could reasonably have believed his life to be in imminent danger; and 2) whether deadl
State v. Hardy 72 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/11/11), , writ denied, 11-338 (La.6/17/11), , the fifth circuit noted: IsThe determination of a defendant’s culpability rests on a two-fold test: 1) whether, given the facts presented, the defendant could reasonably have believed his life to be in imminent danger; and 2) whether deadly force was necessary to prevent the danger.