DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bernard v. Ellis, 111 So. 3d 995.

77 citing documents.

  • Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Ward Four Fire District No. 2 200 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    7/2/12), (citing Cutsinger v. Redfern, 08-2607 (La.
  • Spencer v. Chevron Corp. 202 So. 3d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Board of Supervisors v. Guth 195 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Marcus Miller v. Harold J. Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Miller v. Thibeaux 184 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    "Interpretation of an insurance policy ordinarily involves a legal question that can be properly resolved by a motion for summary judgment.” Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, p. 9 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Marshall v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 182 So. 3d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    22:1295 (hereinafter the “ÜM 'Statute”); Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Williams v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 186 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Bilyeu v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 184 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.7/2/12), ; Cutsinger v. Redfern, 2008-2607 (La.5/22/09), .
  • Lynch-Ballard v. LAMMICO Insurance Agency, Inc. 176 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Id.; Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, p. 9 (La.7/2/12), ; Bonin v. Westport Ins.
  • Lacy Berthiaume v. Keith Gros La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Berthiaume v. Gros 165 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Lee v. Sapp 163 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    As the courts have consistently held, the “[i]nterpretation of an insurance policy ordinarily involves a legal question that can be properly resolved by a motion for summary judgment.” Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, p. 9 (La.7/2/12), ; Bonin v. Westport Ins.
  • Porretto v. Perkins 158 So. 3d 826 La. 2015
    Unlike the mandatory liability policy in Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), , the policy at issue is a voluntary personal umbrella policy.
  • Nielson v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 167 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2 Nielson relies on the recent Louisiana Supreme Court case, Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Green v. Johnson 149 So. 3d 766 La. 2014
    See also Bernard, v. Ellis,, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), (recognizing that an automobile insurance policy must first be examined for contractual UM coverage, and if contractual coverage is absent, “if a plaintiff is insured under the auto liability coverage, he is entitled to UM coverage” (citing Magnon v. Collins and Filipski v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance
  • Ashanti Green, as Tutrix of the Minors, Dave Peterson III and David Peterson v. Michael Johnson, State Farm … La. 2014
    7/2/12), (recognizing that an automobile insurance policy must first be examined for contractual UM coverage, and if contractual coverage is absent, “if a plaintiff is insured under the auto liability coverage, he is entitled to UM coverage” (citing Magnon v. Collins and Filipski v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance
  • Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 148 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    As the courts have consistently held, the “[ijnterpretation of an insurance policy ordinarily involves a legal question that can be properly resolved by a motion for summary judgment.” Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, p. 9 (La.7/2/12), ; Bonin v. Westport Ins.
  • Connie Evans v. Randy Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Evans v. Bordelon 161 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Burrows v. Executive Property Management Co. 137 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    We note that the “[interpretation of an insurance policy ordinarily involves a legal question that can be properly resolved by a motion for summary judgment.” Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, p. 9 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Distinguished Daniels v. SMG Crystal, LLC 128 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, e.g. Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), ; Orleans Dist.
  • Tyler v. Dejean 121 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377, pp. 9-10 (La.7/2/12), -03 .
  • Love v. Sirey 119 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 (La.7/2/12), ; Graphia v. Schmitt, 08-613 (La.App.
  • Ainsworth v. Tri Star Builders, L.L.C. 156 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Garza v. Argueta 113 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Bernard v. Ellis, 11-2377 p. 5 (La.7/2/12), , 2012 WL 2512772 .
  • Patterson v. Stephenson's Tree Service, LLC 110 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.7/2/12), p. 14-15, , 2012 WL 2512772 .
  • Daniels v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 109 So. 3d 32 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    DISCUSSION The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Bernard v. Ellis, 2011-2377 (La.07/02/12), , determined the issue raised by Imperial of whether or not the plaintiffs in the present case are entitled to coverage under Imperial’s policy.