Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duncan, 91 So. 3d 504.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Charles Penn La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 5/2/12), , 511.
State v. Morgan 244 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 5/2/12), , 520 (providing that the witnesses' prior inconsistent out-of-court statements could be admitted as substantive evidence of the offense rather than solely for purposes of impeachment where there was evidence corroborating the prior inconsistent statements).
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 5/2/12), , 521, as follows: Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, courts of appeal generally refuse to reconsider their own rulings of law on a subsequent appeal in the same case.
State ex rel. H.J. 238 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 5/2/12), , 521.
State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Sandifer 195 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Smith 186 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Gaubert 179 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Marx 163 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 5/2/12), (); see also Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/2/12), ; State v. Green, 10-1355, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/2/12), ; State v. Green, 10-1355, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Celestain 146 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/2/12), ; State v. Green, 10-1355, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Robertson 136 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Augustine 133 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/2/12), ; State v. Green, 10-1355, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/2/12), (delay after denial of motions for new and for arrest of judgment); State v. Green, 2010-1355, p. 12 (La.App.
State ex rel. A.S. 156 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 4 Cir. 5/2/12), , 520: Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, courts of appeal generally refuse to reconsider their own rulings of law on a subsequent appeal in the same case.
Explained State v. Jackson 115 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/2/12), -17 , wherein we explained that officers’ testimony as to witnesses’ identification of a defendant— “both in their respective statements as well as their assertions in selecting the defendant in ...
State v. Joyner 107 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 5/2/12), , stating: A statement of identification by a witness of a person after perceiving him— as contemplated by La.