Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hugle, 104 So. 3d 598.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Michael R. Shorts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), (citing Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279, 113 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua C. Riley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12) ).4 “[T]rial error occurs during the presentation of the case to the [jury] and may be quantitatively assessed in context of the other evidence to determine whether its admission at trial is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id.
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Cardet Withers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 11/7/12), citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.H.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279, 113 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Travis Boys La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), ( (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Daniel T. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 4th Cir. 11/ 7/ 12), writ denied, 12- 2721 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone T. Duckett La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12) (citing Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279, 113 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Jonterry A. Bernard La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), writ denied, 12-2721 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Steven Arnold La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), writ denied, 12-2721 (La.
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 11/7/12), , 615 ("Once the defense opens the door in cross examination on a subject, it becomes a proper subject for redirect", , 157 (La.
State v. Thomassie 206 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/7/12), (“Once the defense opens the door in cross examination on a subject it becomes a proper subject for redirect”, (La.App.
State v. Pollard 165 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/7/12), ( (La.App.
State v. Hartford 162 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , writ denied 12-2721 (La.6/14/13), , citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Greenberry 154 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , citing State v. *709 Wille
Hightower v. Schwartz 151 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12) ; -616 (commenting that once a party "opens the door," the witness may be cross-examined or redirected on that matter; approaching a prohibited area precludes "closing the door” to clarification by opposing counsel).
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , writ denied, 12-2721 (La.6/14/13), .
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , writ denied, 2012-2721 (La.6/14/13), .
State v. Jordan 145 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), ( (La.App.
State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 115 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/7/12), , citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.