Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Trosclair, 89 So. 3d 340.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.D. La. 2025
5/8/12), -57 (“[P]unitive aspects [of amendment extending post-release supervision period for sex offenders] .
Anthony Gallo v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Tazin Ardell Hill (Parish of Lafayette) The district court's declaration that the statutes are … La. 2020
5/8/12), (citing Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 93, 123 S.Ct.
State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Richardson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 8/ 12), the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that La.
In re State In Interest of N.J. 275 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/8/12), , 350, the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed its position that the restrictions imposed by the sex offender registration and notification provisions are civil, rather than punitive, for the protection of the public.
State v. Travis 265 So. 3d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/8/12), 3 -47 (footnotes omitted), the supreme court discussed those statutes as follows: [W]e begin our discussion with an overview of the regulatory scheme of supervision and the statutory provisions governing this scheme.
State v. Lowrey 228 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/8/12), -47 (footnotes omitted), the supreme court discussed those statutes as follows: [W]e begin our discussion with an overview of the regulatory scheme of supervision and the statutory provisions governing this scheme, La.Rev.Stat, §§ 15:561 through 15:561.7, added by Acts 2006, No. 242, § 1, effective August 15, 2006
Thomas v. A. Wilbert & Sons, LLC 217 So. 3d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/8/12), (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 614 , 80 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Heard 215 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Trosclair, 11-2302 (La.5/8/12), .
Morales v. Parish of Jefferson 140 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
The first part of this Imtest requires this Court to determine whether the legislature which enacted this law, the Jefferson Parish Council, intended for it to have a “punitive” or a “non-punitive purpose.” 14 See also State v. Trosclair, 11-2302 (La.5/8/12), .
State of Louisiana v. William Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/8/12), (internal citation omitted).
State v. Jones 130 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Trosclair, 2011-2302 (La.5/8/12), (internal citation omitted).
State v. Billiot 104 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Trosclair, 2011-2302, p. 15 (La.5/8/12), .