Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State of Louisiana v. Earl S. Vincent III., 63 So. 3d 1038.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Bunnak Landon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody R. Balach La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Balach 150 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/2/11) , , writ denied, 11-285 (La.6/17/11), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Spriggins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    6/17/11), a case from this court in which the defendant alleged the definition of “dangerous weapon,” an element of the charge against him, was not explained, this court stated: “The test for the validity of a guilty plea does not depend on whether the trial court specifically informed the defendant of ev
  • State v. Spriggins 135 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/2/11) , -84 , unit denied, 11-0285 (La.6/17/11), , a case from this court in which the defendant alleged the definition of “dangerous weapon,” an element of the charge against him, was not explained, this court stated: “The test for the validity of a guilty plea does not depend on whether the trial court specifically informed the defendant of every element of the of
  • State v. Rosales 132 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/2/11) , , writ denied, 11-285 (La.6/17/11), (based on contemporaneous objection rule, La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    6/17/11), this court held in pertinent part: In order for a guilty plea to be valid, there must be a showing that the defendant was informed of and waived his constitutionally guaranteed right to trial by jury, right of confrontation, and right against self-incrimination.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    6/17/11), this court held in pertinent part: In order for a guilty plea to be valid, there must be a showing that the defendant was informed of and waived his constitutionally guaranteed right to trial by jury, right of confrontation, and right against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Sims 123 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), (no constitutional right to a jury trial exists in multiple bill proceedings because all of the elements necessary to enhance the sentence “can be determined by reviewing the documents submitted in support of the multiple bill of information.”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Eldridge Tezano, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    6/17/11), this court found an order that the defendant “pay any outstanding restitution, out of pocket expenses that this victim has[]” was indeterminate and, thus, illegal, because the trial court did not specify the amount of restitution owed.
  • State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), .
  • State v. Pollard 106 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 1/25/11) , , writ denied, 11-316 (La.6/17/11), .
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), .