No. 2012 CA 1829 Precedential Processed

Pamplemoussier, L.L.C. v. Poche

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed September 13, 2013 · 187 So. 3d 480

Opinion text

KUHN, J., concurring. . | iBecause the Poches did not meet their, burden of proof, I agree with the result. Accordingly, I concur., THERIOT, J., dissents & assigns, reason.