Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sims v. American Insurance Co., 101 So. 3d 1.
- Anthony Hyginus Versus Ochsner Clinic, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Ochsner Health Foundation, L.L.C., Ochsner Health Network, LLC, Abc Elevator … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- Bienville Parish School Board v. Thrash Construction Services, LLC, American Testing Lab, LLC, Yeager, Watson & Associates, Inc., … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
-
Neville Kirt; Alvin Kirt; And Lamont Kirt, Individually and on Behalf of Elaine Kirt v. Rebecca C. Metzinger, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
10/16/12), (“while prescription is interrupted by suit against one solidary obligor or joint tortfeasor as to the other solidary obligors and joint tortfeasors not timely sued, ...
- S.B., by and Through Her Parents, S.B. and M.B. Versus Jefferson Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
Eileen Granier and Brett Granier v. Lexington Insurance Company, Health Care Indemnity, Inc., Vernon J. Carriere, M.D. and …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
10/16/12), (“while prescription is interrupted by suit against one solidary obligor or joint tortfeasor as to the other solidary obligors and joint tortfeasors not timely sued, .
- Palermo v. Century Indem. Co. 248 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Robert Frank Palermo v. Century Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Theriot v. Archer Constr., L.L.C. 250 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Love v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London 241 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Guidry v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co.
213 So. 3d 406
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/16/12), , supports its position that a dismissal with prejudice is a voluntary dismissal.
-
Calvin Arrant v. Wayne Acree Pls, Inc. & Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation
187 So. 3d 417
La. 2016
Co., 12-0204, p. 9 (La.10/16/12), ("[A] dismissal with prejudice has ‘the effect of a final judgment of absolute dismissal after trial,’ and therefore, has res judicata effect on the parties to the suit dismissed with prejudice.”).
-
Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kyle
183 So. 3d 780
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 12-0204, p. 6 (La.10/16/12), [citations omitted].
-
Bailey ex rel. Brown v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
184 So. 3d 200
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the only relevance of a dismissal with prejudice, as opposed to without prejudice, is that a dismissal with prejudice has res judicata effect on the parties to the suit dismissed with prejudice.
-
Bailey ex rel. Brown v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
184 So. 3d 191
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the only relevance of a dismissal with prejudice, as opposed to without prejudice, is that a dismissal with prejudice has- res judicata effect on the parties to the suit dismissed with prejudice.
-
Bailey ex rel. Brown v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
184 So. 3d 208
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the only relevance of a dismissal with prejudice, as opposed to without prejudice, is that a dismissal with prejudice has res judicata effect on the parties to the suit dismissed with prejudice.
-
Roberts v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.
168 So. 3d 418
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
10/16/12), , to support its position.