No. 2012-C-1084
Precedential
Processed
Pizani v. St. Bernard Parish
Pizani v. St. Bernard Parish, 125 So. 3d 546 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013).
Cited by
- Graphic Packaging International, LLC v. ARCO National Construction Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Daniel Bennett v. Demco Energy Services, Llc, Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Cox La. 2024
- William S. Walker v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Zach Bellard v. Atk Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- William "Bill" Jones, IV and Engelique Jones and the Succession of Connie Marable v. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
- Herman v. Tracage Development, L.L.C. 201 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. Bernard 141 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Opinion text
LANDRIEU, J. concurs with reasons. The clear language of La. C.C.P. art. 1111 allows a defendant to bring in to the lawsuit any person who may be liable to him for all or part of the principal demand. La. C.C.P. art. 1033 permits the trial court, in the exercise of its broad discretion, to allow the filing of a third party demand at any time if it will not retard the progress of the principal action. The allowing of the third party demand does not address itself to exceptions that may be filed by the third party defendant once in the suit. On this basis, I respectfully concur in the result reached by the majority.