Serou v. Touro Infirmary
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 24, 2013 115 So. 3d 688; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 9, 2013 105 So. 3d 1068
Serou v. Touro Infirmary, 129 So. 3d 540 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013).
The holding in the court’s own words
ORDER |,Because we conclude that Aggreko’s argument that the reversal of the trial court judgment dated September 29, 2011, in its favor and against Touro requires either a unanimous three-judge panel or a referral to a five-judge panel under La.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Daniel Cathey v. State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- Kunow v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. 258 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Bloom v. State 256 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard 197 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Serou v. Touro Infirmary 191 So. 3d 1090 La. 2016
- Navarre v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Office of Motor Vehicles 153 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Opinion text
ORDER |,Because we conclude that Aggreko’s argument that the reversal of the trial court judgment dated September 29, 2011, in its favor and against Touro requires either a unanimous three-judge panel or a referral to a five-judge panel under La. Const, art. V, § 8(B), we hereby RECALL and VACATE our Order of January 24, 2013 by which we denied Aggreko’s application for rehearing, GRANT only the application of Aggreko for rehearing, VACATE our judgment of January 9, 2013, insofar and only insofar as it decided the appeal of the judgment of September 29, 2011 (but not of the judgment of October 5, 2011), and refer the matter to a five-judge panel for oral argument. JUDGE PAUL A. BONIN JUDGE DANIEL L. DYSART JUDGE ROSEMARY LEDET