Willis v. Brooks
Willis v. Brooks, 119 So. 3d 890 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013).
Cited by
- Green v. Garcia-Victor 248 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc. 35 So. 3d 1053
Opinion text
BONIN, J., concurs with reasons. hi concur. Mr. Willis has established that genuine issues of material fact exist such that the defendants’ conduct could be found to be unethical, fraudulent, immoral, unscrupulous, deceptive and even collusive. But he has not shown that the defendants’ conduct offends established public policy in such a commercial real estate transaction. See Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc., 09-1633, p. 10 (La.4/23/10), 35 So.3d 1053, 1059 . Because offending established public policy is an essential element of a claim under LUT-PA, the absence of factual support for that essential element is fatal to Mr. Willis’ claim. See La. C.C.P. art. 966 C(2).