Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 112 So. 3d 796.

21 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
3/19/13), 805; State v. Wilson, 12-1765, p. 19 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Reginald Weeden La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3/19/13), -02 (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated: The peremptory challenge occupies an important role in the jury selection process.
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/19/13), -02 (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated: The peremptory challenge occupies an important role in the jury selection process.
State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3/19/13), -02 (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated: The peremptory challenge occupies an important role in the jury selection process.
State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/19/13), -02 (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated: *373 The peremptory challenge occupies an important role in the jury selection process.
State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Lewis, 12-1021, p. 16 (La.3/19/13); .
State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 799.1; State v. Patterson, 2012-2042 (La.3/19/13), ; State v. Lewis, 2012-1021 (La.3/19/13), , and noting that “[gjiven the non-unanimous verdict and the fact that all three jurors whom the defense moved to back strike voted to convict, it cannot be said that the judge’s error was harmless.” “Back striking, or the exercise of a peremptory challenge to strike a provisionally-accepted juror, is expressly author
State v. Lewis 146 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2012-1021 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Wells 156 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Lewis, 12-1021, pp. 15-16 (La.3/19/13), -805 , citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. at 24 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Lewis, 12-1021, p. 15-16 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Jordan 145 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Lewis, 2012-1021 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Ross 137 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 799.1.” State v. Lewis, 12-1021, p. 8 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Hamdan 131 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
824 , which held that the burden is upon the beneficiary of the error), rev’d, 12-1021 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also, State v. Lewis, 2012-1021 (La.3/19/13), , and State v. Patterson, 2012-2042 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
12 See also, Nelson, 10-1724, p. 23, 85 So.3d at 37 ; State v. Lewis, 12-1021, p. 13 (La.3/19/13), ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jerome Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/19/13), In that event, prejudice is presumed.
State v. Thomas 124 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lewis, 12-1021 (La.3/19/13), ; In that event, prejudice is presumed.
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lewis, 12-1021, pp. 15-16 (La.3/19/13), .
State v. Hankton 122 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 4/4/12), , 1172 rev’d on other grounds, 12-1021 (La.3/19/13), (noting, “because the defendant failed to lodge any pre-verdict objection to the constitutionality of the complained-of provisions, the post-verdict motion for mistrial notwithstanding, he is precluded from assigning such as error on appeal”).
State v. Patterson 112 So. 3d 806 La. 2013
4 *810 LAW AND ANALYSIS For the reasons assigned this day in State v. Lewis, 2012-1021 (La.3/19/13), , 2013 WL 1115398 , we agree with the court of appeal’s conclusion that the district court erred in denying defense counsel permission to back strike provisionally-selected juror McCall at the end of the second venire panel, before the court swore in the jury panel as a whole.