Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bazile, 144 So. 3d 719.

32 citing documents.

Gerald Williams v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. 2025
5/7/13), Cf. State v. Perry, 610 So.
State of Louisiana v. Norman Smith La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
5/7/13), State v. Landrieu, 17-0950 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jakiya Muller La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
5/7/13), this court recognized a defendant's right to trial by jury and the waiver of that right are not unbridled, as it declared the mandatory forty-five day filing delay set forth in La.
Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
5/7/13), State v. Weaver, 01-0467 (La.1/15/02), 805 So.
Louise Kaltenbaugh, ph.D. and Katherine Robinson, ph.D. v. Board of Supervisors, Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
James Cunningham v. the City of New Orleans & the New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Pedro Monterroso La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Jessie James Baker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
5/ 7/ 13), the Supreme Court addressed the preservation of constitutional issues for review: This court has long held the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.T. La. 2020
5/7/13), ( (citations omitted)).
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie A/K/A El Jerico Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5/7/13), for the proposition that for a defendant’s waiver of a trial by jury to be knowing and intelligent, the defendant need only understand “that the choice confronting him is on one hand to be judged by a group of his people from his community, and on the other hand to have his guilt or innocence determined by the ju
State of Louisiana v. Hunter Fussell La. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/7/13), the supreme court addressed the preservation of constitutional issues for review: This court has long held the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.
State v. White 269 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
5/7/13), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the 45-day period applies prior to the initial trial date regardless of any subsequent continuances.
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/7/13), the supreme court explained that: “[A] criminal defendant’s waiver of his right to trial by jury is knowing and intelligent when he demonstrates his understanding that he will proceed to trial before a judge upon that waiver.” In this regard, a passage in the sanity commission report referenced by the State
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/7/13), the supreme court interpreted “trial date” in La.Const.
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/7/13), the supreme court interpreted “trial date” in La.Const.
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/7/13), , 735, the supreme court interpreted "trial date" in La.Const.
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/7/13), , 735, the supreme court interpreted "trial date" in La.Const.
State v. Brignac 241 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Green 227 So. 3d 818 La. 2017
5/7/13), (Emphasis added.)
State v. Mahogany 191 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Steven Doise La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
05/07/13), reh’g denied (Aug.
State v. Doise 185 So. 3d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Bazile, 2012-2243 (La.05/07/13), , reh’g denied (Aug.
State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
her guilt or innocence determined, by a judge.” State v. Bazile, 12-2243, p. 17 (La.5/7/13), .
State of Louisiana v. Laken Andrew Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
5/7/13), (citations omitted) (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated the following in reference to a defendant’s waiver of jury trial: To be valid, a defendant’s waiver of his right to jury trial must be knowing and intelligent.
State v. Johnson 165 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Bazile, 12-2243, pp. 17-18 (La.5/7/13), (citations omitted) (footnote omitted), the supreme court stated the following in reference to a defendant’s waiver of jury trial: To be valid, a defendant’s waiver of his right to jury trial must be knowing and intelligent.
State v. Le 165 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bazile, 12-2243, p. 18 (La.5/7/13), ; see also Brady, supra.
State v. Miorana 156 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
rdance with the time limits set forth in Article 521” (generally by motion filed within fifteen days after arraignment); (4) but, “with permission of the court, he may exercise his right to waive trial by jury at any time prior to commencement of trial.” 1 “To be valid, a defendant’s waiver of his right to a jury trial must be knowing and intelligent.” State v. Bazile, 12-2243, p. 17 (La.5/7/13), .
State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The State relies on State v. Bazile, 2012-2243 (La.5/7/13), , wherein the Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s ruling granting the defendant’s motion to declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional when the defendant waived his right to a jury trial less than forty-five days prior to trial.
Eddy Oliver, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v. Orleans Parish School Board 156 So. 3d 596 La. 2014
State v. Bazile, 12-2243 (La.5/7/13), (citing State v. Weaver, 01-467 (La.1/15/02), ).
State v. McKeel 153 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Const, art. I, § 17(A), added, “[ejxcept in capital cases, a defendant may knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a trial [¡¡by jury but no later than forty-five days prior to the trial date and the waiver shall be irrevocable.” 1 In State v. Bazile, 12-2243 (La.5/7/13), , the court interpreted the term “trial date” in La.