No. 2012-KH-2116 Precedential Processed

State ex rel. Montgomery v. State

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed March 15, 2013 · 109 So. 3d 371

Also decided on this docket: La., May 3, 2013 112 So. 3d 853

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

In re Montgomery, Montie B.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 73,274; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,648-KW. Writ granted in part. The state presented constitutionally insufficient evidence to sustain the conspiracy to distribute cocaine conviction because relator could not enter into an agreement with the state agent with whom he negotiated the illegal drug sale. R.S. 14:26; see, e.g., State v. Joles, 485 So.2d 212, 214 (La.App.1986) (criminal conspiracy charge correctly quashed when one party, as state agent, lacked requisite intent to commit crime). Because a timely claim asserting insufficient evidence is cognizable on collateral review, see e.g. State v. Jacobs, 504 So.2d 817 (La.1987), relator’s conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribution are vacated. In all other respects, relator’s applications are denied.