Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Barber, 89 So. 3d 1145.

64 citing documents.

Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 187 So. 3d 395 La. 2015
Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, p. 7 (La.3/30/12), .
Alexis Hunt v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 163 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232 (La.03/30/12), ; Marin, supra.
Scott v. Zaheri 157 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, pp. 8-9 (La.3/30/12); .
Emile Mouton v. Generac Power Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Mouton v. Generac Power Systems, Inc. 152 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, pp. 8-9 (La.3/30/12), .
Seaman v. Jimes 150 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Wells v. Zadeck, 2011-1232 (La.3/30/12), ; Taylor v. Broomfield, 46,590 (La.App.
Albe v. City of New Orleans 150 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
These categories allow “the courts to weigh the ‘equitable nature of the circumstances in each individual case’ to determine whether prescription will be tolled.” Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, p. 9 (La.3/30/12); , citing Plaquemines Parish Commission Council, 502 So.2d at 1054-1055 .
Succession of Scurlock 140 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, p. 9 (La.3/30/12), ; Kilpatrick, 625 So.2d at 227 .
Wells v. Webb 125 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Wells v. Zadeck, 2011-1232 (La.3/30/12), 8-9, at 1150 , and citations therein.
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc. 120 So. 3d 678 La. 2013
927 and 966(C)(2); Wells v. Zadeck, 2011-1232, p. 7 (La.3/30/12); .
Pociask v. Moseley 122 So. 3d 533 La. 2013
Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, p. 7 (La.3/30/12), , 1149; Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, p. 6 (La.7/6/10), .
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Kenneth Forrestier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/30/12), -50, the supreme court discussed the exception of prescription, stating: 3 The Loiseaus argue that, because the trial court granted both exceptions on the basis of La.Code Civ.P.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Forrestier 112 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 In Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, pp. 6-7 (La.3/30/12), -50 , the supreme court discussed the exception of prescription, stating: Is An exception of prescription must be specifically pleaded and may not be supplied by the court.