Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pociask v. Moseley, 122 So. 3d 533.

13 citing documents.

GANNETT RIVER STATES PUBLISHING CORPORATION D/B/A DAILY ADVERTISER VERSUS 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONALD D. LANDRY La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
6/28/13), - 541, the court stated: The fundamental question in all cases of statutory interpretation is legislative intent and the ascertainment of the reason or reasons that prompted the legislature to enact the law.
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
6/28/13), Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.
Quatrevingt v. State 242 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Oil Country Tubular Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Justiss Oil Co. v. Oil Country Tubular Corp. 216 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Shields v. Alvin R. Savoie & Associates, Inc. 214 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
See also Pociask v. Moseley, 13-0262 (La.6/28/13), ; Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), ; T.D.
State of Louisiana v. Garren Keith Jim La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Jim 162 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Pociask v. Moseley, 13-262 (La.6/28/13), .
Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Arnaud v. Dies 153 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Pociask v. Moseley, 13-262, pp. 5-6 (La.6/28/13), .
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 132 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Pociask v. Moseley, 2013-0262 (La.6/28/13), .
Parents of Minor Child v. Charlet 135 So. 3d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Pociask v. Moseley, 2013-0262 (La.6/28/13), (2013).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by