Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, 110 So. 3d 557 (La. 2013).
Cited by
- Frank Darby, Jr. v. Daniel Vallere La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- State v. Dorsey 260 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Adrian A. Dorsey A/K/A Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- State v. Hall 160 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Brett Owen Bourque v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Bourque v. Transit Mix 161 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Marshall 134 So. 3d 1159 La. 2014
- David B. Trahan, II v. Wendell R. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Thomas 116 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 475 So. 2d 1063
Opinion text
HUGHES, J., dissenting in part. I respectfully dissent in part. The interlocutory discovery orders are renewable with the final judgment appealed. There is a distinction between party-initiated discovery and court-ordered discovery. Compare La. C.C.P. arts. 1469 and 1471. MTU of N. Am., Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., 475 So.2d 1063 (La.1985). “Sanctions” may be ordered under the latter article, while reasonable expenses including attorney’s fees may be awarded, after a hearing, pursuant to the former. I would therefore vacate the $500 “sanction” ordered in this case. In all other respects, I would deny the writ.