DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Regis v. Department of Police, 121 So. 3d 665.

13 citing documents.

  • Jimmie Turner v. New Orleans Police Department La. 2021
    6/28/13), (per curiam); Gant v. New Orleans Police Dep’t, 19-0640, p. 14 (La.App.
  • Ryne Schuler v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    6/28/13), -66 (quoting Davis v. Dep’t of Police, (La.App.
  • Rhett Charles v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • Randi Gant v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    6/28/13), (per curiam) (citations omitted).
  • Cunningham v. New Orleans Police Dep't 257 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Thomas J. Bell, Sr. v. the City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    6/28/13), -66 (last three alterations ours), stated: When an officer violates the law, “it casts doubt upon the credibility of the [police department] to ably conduct one of its principal; functions.” Berry v. Dep’t of Pub.
  • Bell v. City of Lake Charles 218 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    6/28/13), -66 (last three alterations ours), stated: When an officer violates the law, “it casts doubt upon the credibility of the [police department] to ably conduct one of its principal functions.” Berry v. Dep’t of Pub.
  • Aucoin v. Department of Police 229 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    6/28/13), , which held that violation of a state statute ipso facto impairs the efficient operation of the department.
  • Michel v. Department of Police 212 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Abbott v. New Orleans Police Department 165 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Similarly, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Regis v. Department of Police, 13-1124, p. 1 (La.6/28/13), , that “since the public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, it is essential the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.” Id.
  • Hurst v. Department of Police 146 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    CONCLUSION: Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained “since the public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, it is essential the ^appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce the appropriate standards of conduct for its employees who are sworn to uphold that trust.” Regis v. Dep’t of Police, 13-1124, p. 3 (La.6/28/13), .
  • Adams v. Department of Police 135 So. 3d 624 La. 2014
    Regis v. Department of Police, 13-1124, p. 2 (La.6/28/13), .
  • Adams v. Department of Police 131 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    In Regis v. Department of Police, 2013-1124 (La.6/28/13), , the NOPD issued a letter of reprimand to an officer who admitted violating La.