No. 2013-C-1304
Precedential
Processed
Cloud v. Barnes
Also decided on this docket: La., November 1, 2013 124 So. 3d 1105
Cloud v. Barnes, 122 So. 3d 1006 (La. 2013).
Cited by
- Kathryn Maguire Marks Versus Ladd Robert Marks La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
- Steven R. Keene v. Ashley M. Holdsworth Consolidated with Ashley M. Holdsworth v. Steven … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
- Molinere v. Lapeyrouse 214 So. 3d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Meadows v. Winkler 154 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Opinion text
HUGHES, J., would grant the writ and assigns reasons. The defendants effected a de facto sus-pensive appeal by intentionally disobeying the trial court’s order to cancel the lis pendens. While plaintiff may not have responded in the best manner (a rule for contempt would have been more appropriate), I can understand the frustration. Given the factual background of this litigation, I do not believe sanctions were appropriate. Accordingly, I would grant the writ.