Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board, 144 So. 3d 922.

36 citing documents.

Kristin Deleo v. Lindsey Marie Nicolini La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Jackson's Landing North v. Garnisha Phillips La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
2/14/14), (quoting Adkins v. Huckabay, 1999-3605, p. 16 (La.
Alfred Conhagen, Inc. of Louisiana v. Ruhrpumpen, Inc. and Waldemar S. Nelson and Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Sherome Hankton v. the State of Louisiana, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans (University Hospital), Through the … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Geneva Hebert v. the Fresh Market, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Magri v. Jazz Casino Co. 275 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Jack v. Eldorado Casino Shreveport Joint Venture 264 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Robert J. Broussard v. Multi-Chem Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/14/14), (citation omitted) (providing that “[t]he initial inquiry, in reviewing an award of general damages, is whether the trier of fact abused its discretion in assessing the amount of damages.
Broussard v. Multi-Chem Grp., LLC 252 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/14/14), , 928 (citation omitted) (providing that "[t]he initial inquiry, in reviewing an award of general damages, is whether the trier of fact abused its discretion in assessing the amount of damages.
Broussard v. Multi-Chem Grp., LLC 255 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/14/14), , 928 (citation omitted) (providing that "[t]he initial inquiry, in reviewing an award of general damages, is whether the trier of fact abused its discretion in assessing the amount of damages.
Alvin Pete v. State of Louisiana, Department of Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Pete v. State 247 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Gaines v. Laura Wilson, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 240 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/14/14, 6), , 927 (emphasizing "the importance of deferring to the trier of fact's findings, 'as the trier of fact is not disadvantaged by the review of a cold record,' and 'is in a superior position to observe the nuances of demeanor evidence not revealed in a record' ") (quoting Adkins v. Huckabay , 99-3605, p. 16 (La.
Traci L. Hebert v. Barry's Air Conditioning, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Products 223 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Wise v. Nanda 211 So. 3d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Kirk A. Sparrow v. City of Jeanerette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/14/14), Meche v. Gray Ins.
Sparrow v. City of Jeanerette 210 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Sandalon Jacobs v. David Sampson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Jacobs v. Sampson 206 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 198 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Bd., 2013-1424 (La.2/14/14), ; Snider v. Louisiana Med.
Victoria Dauzat v. Dolgencorp, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Dauzat v. Dolgencorp, LLC 215 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bd., 13-1424 (La.2/14/14), .
Brown v. City of Shreveport 188 So. 3d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Purvis v. Grant Parish School Bd., 2013-1424 (La.2/14/14), , 307 Ed. L. Rep.
Brown v. Travelers Insurance Co. 187 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bd., 13-1424, p. 4 (La.2/14/14), .
Sherry Wedgeworth, Et Ux. v. Tynes E. Mixon, III, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Wedgeworth v. Mixon 184 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bd., 13-1424 (La.2/14/14), .
Stephen Michael Duke" Allgood, Et Ux. v. Roch Bordelon " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Allgood v. Bordelon 185 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bd., 13-1424, p. 4 (La.2/14/14), .
Donovan Meche v. Gray Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Meche v. Gray Insurance Co. 178 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bd., 13-1424, p. 6 (La.2/14/14), .
Destiny Guidry v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2/14/14), our supreme court set forth the applicable appellate standard of review relative to this case as follows: In Stobart v. State, through DOTD, this court set forth a two-part test for the reversal of the fact-finder’s determinations: 1) The appellate court
Guidry v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. 164 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR In her sole assignment of error, Ms. Guidry asserts: “The jury committed manifest error and made a decision which was clearly wrong when it concluded that[] Defendant, Kenneth Wyant, was not at fault in causing an accident on June 14th, 2011.” | gLAW AND DISCUSSION In Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board, 13-1424, p. 4 (La.2/14/14), , our supreme court set forth the applicable appellate standard of review relative to this case as follows: In Stobart v. State, through DOTD, thi
Mark Sharbeno v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2/14/14), our supreme court set forth the applicable appellate standard of review as follows: In Stobart v. State, through DOTD, this court set forth a two-part test for the reversal of the fact-finder’s determinations: 3 Prior to trial, Ms. Sharbeno settled he
Sharbeno v. Allstate Insurance Co. 153 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board, 13-1424, p. 4 (La.2/14/14), , our supreme court set forth the applicable appellate standard of review as follows: In Stobart v. State, through DOTD, this court set forth a two-part test for the reversal of the fact-finder’s determinations: |31) The appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual
Granger v. United Home Health Care 145 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board, 13-1424 (La.2/14/14), , 2014 WL 683721 .