Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 145 So. 3d 271.

82 citing documents.

  • Leidelmeijen v. Ferncrest Manor Nursing Home Luba Workers' Comp. 191 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, pp. 14-15 (La.5/7/14), -82 .
  • Thompson v. DHH-Office of Public Health 191 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Stephanie Lemelle Ardoin v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    5/7/14), that: “Louisiana R.S.
  • Ardoin v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 184 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Our supreme court has explained in Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, p. 18-20 (La.5/7/14), , 284 that: “Louisiana R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lynn E. Foret, M.D. La. 2016
  • Green v. Allied Building Stores, Inc. 185 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Church Mutual Insurance, Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.05/07/14), .
  • Travis P. Prince v. Superior Energy Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/7/14), (footnotes omitted)(emphasis added): With the express intent of delivering health care services to injured employees “in an efficient and timely manner,” La.R.S.
  • Prince v. Superior Energy Services, L.L.C. 181 So. 3d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Mr. Prince directs us to our supreme court’s decision in Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, pp. 19-20 (La.5/7/14), , (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added): With the express intent of delivering health care services to injured employees “in an efficient and timely manner,” La.R.S.
  • Thomas v. Marsala Beverage Co. 179 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Co. v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), ; Gilliam v. Brooks Heating & Air Conditioning, supra, La.
  • Paul v. State, Department of Public Safety 182 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 279 n. 9.
  • Sanchez v. Caesar's Entertainment, Inc. 166 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • State v. Foret 174 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 279 n. 9.
  • Gales v. Whole Food Co. 165 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    On May 7, 2014, the Supreme Court rendered separate opinions, affirming the Third Circuit decision in Cook v. Family Care Services, Inc., 13-2326, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , and remanding for further proceedings, and reversing this Court’s decision in Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 13-2351, 13-0037 (La.5/7/14), , and remanding for further proceedings.
  • Arrant v. Wayne Acree PLS, Inc. 164 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed La.
  • Gay Lowery v. Jena Nursing & Rehab Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Brett Owen Bourque v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/7/14), Cook v. Family Care Servs., Inc., 13-2326, 13-2351 (La.
  • Bourque v. Transit Mix/Trinity Ind. 162 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), ; Cook v. Family Care Servs., Inc., 13-2326, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Lowery v. Jena Nursing & Rehabilitation 160 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Greavis v. Iberville Parish School Board 167 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    23:1203(A); see also Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 2013-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Michel v. State, Division of Administrative Law 167 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), -279 (explaining that a law operates retroactively when it goes back to the past, modifying or suppressing the effects or rights already acquired, citing Pla-ñid, Treatise on the Civil Law § 243(A) at 175).
  • Todd Mouton v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/7/14), - 88, holding that the medical treatment guidelines and Medical Director procedures outlined in La.R.S.
  • Barker v. Lemic Insurance Co. 149 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Following the decision of Romero , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue in Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, pp. 24-25 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Lafayette Care Center v. Mouton 146 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, p. 9 (La.5/7/14), (quoting Sawicki v. K/S Stavanger Prince, 01-0528, p. 10 (La.12/7/01), -605 ), the supreme court specifically held that “It is well settled that, ‘no one has a vested right in any given mode of procedure.’ ” Therefore, LCC had no “vested right” to the procedure in place for filing of a Form 1008
  • Edwards v. Plant Works 145 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    PETERS, J. liWe consider this matter on remand from the supreme court for reconsidera *1109 tion in light of its opinion in Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , and Cook v. Family Care Services, Inc., 13-2326 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800038 .
  • Romero v. Garan's, Inc. 145 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    PETERS, J. liWe consider this matter on remand from the supreme court for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , and Cook v. Family Care Services, Inc., 13-2326 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800038 .
  • Gilliam v. Brooks Heating & Air Conditioning 146 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Co. v. Bardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Spikes v. Louisiana Commerce & Trade Ass'n 161 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, p. 13 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , the supreme court determined that “La.R.S.
  • Daniels v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 144 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.05/07/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , abrogated the majority opinion in Wal-Mart.
  • Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Wooden 147 So. 3d 1116 La. 2014
    The case is remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation for reconsideration in light of Church Mutual Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , and Cook v. Family Care Services, Inc., 13-2326 (La.5/7/14), .
  • Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Wooden 144 So. 3d 1035 La. 2014
    The case is remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation for reconsideration in light of Church Mutual Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , and Cook v. Family Care Ser *1036 vices, Inc., 18-2326 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800038 .
  • Cook v. Family Care Services, Inc. 144 So. 3d 969 La. 2014
    LAW AND ANALYSIS For the reasons assigned this day in Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Dardar, 13-2351 (La.5/7/14), , 2014 WL 1800067 , we find La.
  • Mouton v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office 158 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    On the same day, the supreme court issued its opinion in Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar, 13-2351, p. 24 (La.5/7/14), -88 , holding that the medical treatment guidelines and Medical Director procedures outlined in La.R.S.