Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hall, 127 So. 3d 30.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of F.M. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), (finding that a motion for appeal need not be in writing when such a motion is made and granted orally).
State of Louisiana v. Keith Johnson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), - 39.
State of Louisiana v. Merlin P. Dejean La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), -39).
State of Louisiana v. Rasheed McClebb La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), (citing State v. Tran, [20]12–1219, p. 2 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Louis Barnes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), -39.
State of Louisiana v. Michelle D. Harris La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
4 Cir. 10/9/13), (citing State v. Tran, 12-1219, p. 2 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Justin Marshall La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Wells 262 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), , 39 (citing State v. Tran , 12-1219, p. 2 (La.
State v. Andrews (In re Andrews) 255 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), , 34-38 ; State v. Brooks , 13-0540, pp. 3-8 (La.
State v. Fletcher 238 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 10/9/13), , 39.
State v. Vernon 207 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 10/9/13), (citing State v. Tran, 12-1219, p. 2 (La.App.
State v. Grant 198 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , (in cases where motions to quash involve factual 'determinations— such as speedy trial violations and nolle prosequi dismissal-reinstitution cases — this court applies an abuse of discretion standard.)
State v. Broyard 183 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/9/13), (La.App.
In Re: Matter Under Investigation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Brown 176 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/9/13), -39 ; cf. State v. Tran, 12-1219, p. 2, n. 3 (La.App.
State v. Brown 174 So. 3d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Cureaux 165 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lambert 160 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Butler 162 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , (citing State v. Tran, 12-1219, p. 2 (La.App.
State v. Stanley 161 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Williams 156 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , -39 , recently noted that although generally a trial court’s ruling on a motion to quash will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion; when the motion to quash involves solely a legal issue the trial court’s decision is subject to a de novo standard of review.
State v. Jackson 154 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/09/13), (citing State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 9 (La.10/17/06), ); State v. Smith, 99-0606, p. 3 (La.7/6/00), ; State v. M.C., 10-1107, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Richardson 155 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , , this court recognized the standard of review applicable to a trial court’s ruling on a motion to quash is whether a trial court abused its discretion if the trial court makes factual determinations: [Tjhis court in reviewing a.motion to quash involving solely a legal issue ...
State v. Trepagnier 154 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , (citing State v. Tran, 12-1219, p. 2 (La.
State v. Noel 151 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , ; State v. Brooks, 13-0540 (La.App.
State v. Dixon 146 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/09/13), -39 (citing State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 9 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Smith, 99-0606, p. 3 (La.7/6/00), .
State v. Jones 144 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13) , , this Court set forth the proper standard of review: To summarize, this court in reviewing a motion to quash involving solely a legal issue, such as presented in the instant case, applies a de novo standard of review.
State v. Kelly 133 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/9/13), -39 , recently noted that although generally a trial court’s ruling on a motion to quash will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion; when the motion to quash involves solely a legal issue the trial court's decision is subject to a de novo standard of review.
State v. Brady 131 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 10/09/13) , , 2013 WL 5568736 , as follows: To summarize, this court in reviewing a motion to quash involving solely a legal issue ...