Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Franklin, 147 So. 3d 231.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tori Lynette Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Thomas Riggio v. Ports America Louisiana, L.L.C., Andre Bridges, Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Michael Ray Holmes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Scott Lingle La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/14), (footnote omitted) this Court stated: The district attorney has authority over every criminal prosecution instituted by the State of Louisiana in his district.
State of Louisiana v. Nora Avila La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/14), 3 “In determining the conditions of any agreement to divert a defendant from the processes of prosecution, the district attorney is at the outset of the agreement free of judicial interference or coercion.” Id.
State of Louisiana v. Gary Delton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 6/11/14), (citing La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Lang La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
In re Coop. Endeavor Agreement Between 42nd Dist. Indigent Defender Office & 42nd Judicial District Office of Dist. … 255 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/14), , writ denied , 2014-1326 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr., A/K/A Woodrow Karey, II La. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/14), writ denied, 14-1326 (La.
State v. Ross 207 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Brown 193 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 6/11/14), (Bagneris, J., concurring; Lobrano, J., dissenting).
State v. Hampton 183 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/11/14), (“A trial court necessarily abuses its discretion if its ruling is based on an erroneous view or application of the law.”).
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr. AKA Woodrow Karey, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/11/14), writ denied, 14-1326 (La.
State v. Karey 180 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/11/14), , writ denied, 14-1326 (La.2/13/15), , the fourth circuit recognized that “judicial enforcement of [an] agreement not to prosecute was properly sought through the filing of a motion to quash.” *505 The fourth circuit further held that while La.Code Crim.P.