Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pierre, 125 So. 3d 403.

34 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Bertie Randall Hicks La. 2025
Jarvis Ballard v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
10/15/13), (for “free-standing, post- conviction claims of actual innocence not based on DNA evidence,” “this Court declined to hold that such claims are, in fact, cognizable in collateral attacks on final convictions .
State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Jerman Neveaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
10/15/13), the State argues that because it prevailed below, it is entitled to assert any ground fairly supported by the record as a basis for upholding the district court’s ruling.
State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J. Alexander La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
10/15/13), to hold that a bona fide claim for factual innocence requires new, material, noncumulative, and conclusive evidence which meets an extraordinarily high standard and undermines the prosecution’s entire case.
Wilbert Jones v. State Of Louisiana La. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Brittany Tyson La. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Justin Charles Singleton La. 2021
10/15/13), State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Ballard La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
10/15/2013), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Brittany Tyson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
10/15/13), (new evidence of actual innocence must be so compelling that no reasonable juror could have voted to convict with knowledge thereof); State v. Conway, 01-2808, p. 1 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Frederick D. Barrow La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
10/ 15/ 13), ( per curiam); State v. Conway, 2001- 2808 ( La.
Darryl Wayne Jones v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
10/ 15/ 13), Burrell, 184 So.
State Of Louisiana v. Stanley Lindsey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
10/ 15/ 13), State v. Conway, 2001- 2808 ( La.
State of Louisiana Versus Frank Kang La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Nicholls Eason La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/ 15/ 13), ( per curiam) ( which the defendant incorrectly references as " Pierce").
State v. Tyson 267 So. 3d 584 La. 2019
10/15/13), , 409 (new evidence of actual innocence must be so compelling that no reasonable juror could have voted to convict with knowledge thereof); State v. Conway , 01-2808, p. 1 (La.
State v. Grigsby 237 So. 3d 508 La. 2018
10/15/13), ; State v. Conway , 01-2808 (La.
State ex rel. Gross v. State 227 So. 3d 258 La. 2017
State ex rel. Perot v. State 219 So. 3d 324 La. 2017
10/15/13), ; State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.
State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
10/15/13), , the Court further articulated that the new facts must be so compelling that no reasonable juror could have voted to convict with knowledge thereof.
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
10/15/13), , pursuant to which a petitioner must present “new material, noncumulative and conclusive evidence” which “un-dermin[e]s the prosecution’s entire case.” Comway, 01-2808, p. 1, 816 So.2d at 290-91 .
State ex rel. Weiters v. State 206 So. 3d 178 La. 2016
10/15/13), ; State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.
State v. Paul 202 So. 3d 995 La. 2016
10/15/13), (new evidence of actual innocence must be so compelling that no reasonable juror could have voted to convict with knowledge thereof); State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.
State ex rel. Odom v. State 202 So. 3d 995 La. 2016
10/15/13), ; State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.
State v. Wilson 196 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Pierre, 2013-0873 (La.10/15/13), ; State v. Coleman, 13-942 (La.App.
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
10/16/13), , according to which a post-conviction petitioner asserting his actual innocence (not based on DNA) must present “new material, noncumulative and conclusive evidence which meets an extraordinarily high standard, and which undermin[e]s Rthe prosecution’s entire case.” Conway , 01-2808, p. 1, 816 So.2d at 290 -91’.
State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
that after a. conviction the prosecutor also is bound by the ethics of his office to inform the appropriate authority of after-acquired or other information that casts doubt upon the correctness of the conviction,’ ” State v. Pierre, 13-0873, p. 11 (La.10/15/13), .
State ex rel. Williams v. State 195 So. 3d 433 La. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court held in State v. Pierre, 2013-873 (La.10/15/13), , 407: Although this Court declined to hold that such claims are, in fact, cognizable in collateral attacks on final convictions, a question also left Lopen in federal habeas proceedings by the United States Supreme Court in Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 417 , 113 S.Ct.
Burrell v. State 184 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Actual innocence is not demonstrated merely by showing that there was' insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Pierre, 2013-0873 (La.10/15/13), .
State v. Hurst 209 So. 3d 701 La. 2015
1173 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); see also State v. Pierre, 13-0873 (La.10/15/13), ; State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La.4/12/02), .
Jones v. Cain 151 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
20 The Court again declined to determine whether a claim of actual innocence in the absence of DNA exoneration is cognizable in post-conviction review in State v. Pierre, 13-0873 (La.10/15/13), .
State v. Coleman 142 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Pierre, 13-0873 (La.10/15/13), .