Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Montgomery, 194 So. 3d 606.
- State Of Louisiana v. Jason Michael Pilcher La. 2022
-
State of Louisiana v. Troy Shelvin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
6/28/16), Justice Crichton wrote: “Eligibility vel non is the sole question to be answered in a Miller hearing.” In State v. Comeaux, 17-682 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Derrick Sonnier
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
6/28/16); (Crichton, J. concurrence).
-
State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Johnson
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
6/ 28/ 16), identifying additional circumstances a trial court could consider at a Miller hearing in addition to those in LSA- C. Cr.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Emmett Garrison, IV AKA "Lil Emmet"
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
06/28/16), the Louisiana Supreme Court, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, found that the factors listed in La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Aaron G. Hauser
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
6/28/16), (Montgomery II).
-
State v. Davis
269 So. 3d 693
La. 2019
6/28/16), , appellate jurisdiction is now vested in the intermediate court of appeal.
-
State v. Henry
267 So. 3d 644
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/28/16), , 607 (instructing that "[i]n resentencing, the District Court shall determine whether relator was "the rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption," Miller, 132 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
6/28/16), and for resentencing pursuant to La.Code Crim.P.
-
State v. Allen
255 So. 3d 998
La. 2018
See State of Louisiana v. Montgomery, 13-KP-1163, (6/28/16) (Crichton, J., concurring) (....
-
State v. Terrick
254 So. 3d 1246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , the Louisiana Supreme Court acknowledged the Miller ruling and reasoning and remanded the matter to the district court for resentencing of defendant.
-
State v. Sullivan
253 So. 3d 911
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , courts were instructed to utilize La.
- State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
State v. Francis
247 So. 3d 199
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , 607, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: To implement Miller's "meaningful opportunity to obtain release" for those juveniles who commit murder but are not found to be irreparably corrupt, the Legislature in 2013 La.
-
State v. Allen
247 So. 3d 179
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , the Supreme Court provided guidance to the district courts in adjudicating Miller hearings.
- State v. Lewis 244 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Brooks 247 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Schane
239 So. 3d 286
La. 2018
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Harrison
239 So. 3d 406
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), ( per curiam ) and circumvents La.
-
State ex rel. Brooks v. State
237 So. 3d 1181
La. 2018
6/28/16), , and for re-sentencing pursuant to La.
-
State ex rel. Braud v. State
237 So. 3d 504
La. 2018
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Asahel Harvin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/28/16), the statutory provisions regarding prospective sentencing of juveniles were applicable to resentencing hearings, it was necessary for the trial court to determine whether he should be resentenced to life with eligibility for parole.
-
State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
However, counsel admits the sentence imposed was within the parameters established in Montgomery
-
State v. Harvin
239 So. 3d 907
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , the statutory provisions regarding prospective sentencing of juveniles were applicable to resentencing hearings, it was necessary for the trial court to determine whether he should be resentenced to life with eligibility for parole.
-
State v. Comeaux
239 So. 3d 920
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , 607-09 (emphasis added) (first alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: To implement Miller 's"meaningful opportunity to obtain release" for those juveniles who commit murder but are not found to be irreparably corrupt, the Legislature in 2013 La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Roderick Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/28/16), he characterizes the Montgomery ruling as unconstitutional based on his premise regarding courts’ authority or lack thereof.
-
State v. Thomas
237 So. 3d 1201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , he characterizes the Montgomery ruling as unconstitutional based on his premise regarding court's authority or lack thereof.
- State of Louisiana v. Roger Wayne Nash AKA Roger Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- State v. Nash 239 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Evans
245 So. 3d 1112
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.
-
State v. Bradley
243 So. 3d 1253
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
6/28/16), , held courts should utilize La.
- State v. Looney 245 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State v. Palmer 246 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Marshall
245 So. 3d 336
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), , the trial court resentenced defendant to life imprisonment without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, but with the benefit of parole eligibility.
-
State v. Thompson
245 So. 3d 302
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), , precluded the trier of fact from considering an individualized sentence, particularly a term of years, for people who were unconstitutionally sentenced to die in prison as children.
-
State ex rel. Funchess v. State
229 So. 3d 457
La. 2017
6/28/16), , appellate jurisdiction is now vested in the intermediate court of appeal.
- State of Louisiana v. Russell Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Rubin 227 So. 3d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Jackson
243 So. 3d 1093
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), , the trial court vacated his sentence and resentenced him to life imprisonment without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, but with the possibility of parole.
-
State v. Harper
243 So. 3d 1084
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), , to life imprisonment at hard labor, with eligibility for parole.
-
State ex rel. Manieri v. State
222 So. 3d 717
La. 2017
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
- State v. Brown 273 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Keith
223 So. 3d 767
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
06/28/16), (“Montgomery”), the trial court vacated Keith’s original, sentence and re-sentenced him to life imprisonment at hard labor, with the benefit of parole eligibility and credit for time served.
- State v. Plater 222 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Shaw
223 So. 3d 607
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), (“Montgomery per curiam”), Defendant filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence.
-
State v. Sumler
219 So. 3d 503
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
06/28/16), , the trial court vacated Sumler’s sentence and resentenced him to life imprisonment at hard labor, with the benefit of parole eligibility.
-
State v. Kelly
217 So. 3d 576
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/28/16), , directed that La.
-
State ex rel. Wise v. State
211 So. 3d 378
La. 2017
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State ex rel. Gaskin v. State
211 So. 3d 381
La. 2017
6/28/16), , and for resentencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State ex rel. Lewis v. State
208 So. 3d 882
La. 2017
6/28/16), , and for resen-tencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.