No. 2013-KP-1479
Precedential
Processed
State v. Funches
State v. Funches, 140 So. 3d 1165 (La. 2014).
Cited by
- In re Johnson 177 So. 3d 116 La. 2015
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Tate 130 So. 3d 829
Opinion text
In re Funches, Arthur; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 43263. L Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroac *1166 tively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829 , cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663 , 189 L.Ed.2d 214 , 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014). JOHNSON, C.J., dissents and would grant the writ and assigns reasons.