Bailey v. LeBlanc
Bailey v. LeBlanc, 162 So. 3d 372 (La. 2015).
Cited by
- Antonette Smith individually and on behalf of minors, Taniyah Daniel, Tevin Daniel, Jr., and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 203 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 191 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Bailey v. Leblanc 151 So. 3d 1004
- Stobart v. State Through DOTD 617 So. 2d 880
Opinion text
CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons. |Jt is ray opinion that the jury had a “reasonable factual basis” for its refusal to award damages for continued treatment of the plaintiffs neck and back, for the reasons explained in Judge Conery’s concurrence. Bailey v. LeBlanc, 2014-267 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/12/14) , 151 So.3d 1004, 1014 (Conery, J., concurring). See also Stobart v. State Dep’t of Transp. and Dev., 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993) (appellate court may not set aside a jury’s finding of fact unless it finds that “a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding”). Because the jury had a reasonable factual basis for its determination, I believe the Court of Appeal was wrong to reverse on this issue.