Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 174 So. 3d 177.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gary Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 7/29/15), (citing U.S. Const. amend.
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 7/29/15), (footnote omitted), writ denied, 15- 1577 (La.
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189 (footnote omitted), writ denied , 15-1577 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua D. Sant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 7/29/15), writ denied, 15-1577 (La.
State v. Sant 268 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189, writ denied , 15-1577 (La.
State v. Johnson 266 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189.
State v. Carter 257 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 188, this Court recently reiterated the applicable standard of review for sufficiency of evidence claims: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Alexander Bench La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/29/15), writ denied, 15-1577 (La.
State v. Bench 256 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189, writ denied , 15-1577 (La.
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189 ).
State of Louisiana v. Dillion Wade Trahan AKA Dillon Wade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/29/15), writ denied, 15-1577 (La.
State v. Trahan 246 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 189, writ denied , 15-1577 (La.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
" Scott , 15-0778, p. 10, 197 So.3d at 305 (quoting State v. White, 14-0397, pp. 18-19, at 189.)
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , Where the key issue is identification, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof.
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 7/29/15), , 188: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable .to the prosecution, any rational trier, of fact could *734 have found the defendant.guilty beyond ^reasonable doubt.